You can look it up yourself if you aren’t too lazy.
If you are scared to use a legal firearm without a permission slip, then don’t do it. Use whatever rifle makes you comfortable. Easy as that.
In a nutshell .
You can look it up yourself if you aren’t too lazy.
If you are scared to use a legal firearm without a permission slip, then don’t do it. Use whatever rifle makes you comfortable. Easy as that.
Firearms adapted from a rifle or shotgun, whether by sawing, cutting or any other alteration
It does not say here that it is a barrel alteration. Replacing firearm barrel is that firearm alteration, is it not?
![]()
I just assembled this one yesterday. Its a 1953 760 in 30.06. It was a little sad looking when I got it, so it got trimmed to 18.5", and parkerized. Not pretty, but slick and ready for many more years of use, but I might sell.
Yeah...and it’s on the EE. It turned out nice.Well that is cool!
Awesome work, you say shes not pretty, hell id take her for a dance!![]()
I just assembled this one yesterday. Its a 1953 760 in 30.06. It was a little sad looking when I got it, so it got trimmed to 18.5", and parkerized. Not pretty, but slick and ready for many more years of use, but I might sell.
If it is a factory made barrel for a factory rifle then you should be able to find FRT for that firearm with that barrel length. If you cannot find such FRT - then good luck. No one was able to prove legality of such alteration of your firearm so far here.
Lawyer up - join CCFR or get firearm insurance some other way if you don't have one yet.
![]()
I just assembled this one yesterday. Its a 1953 760 in 30.06. It was a little sad looking when I got it, so it got trimmed to 18.5", and parkerized. Not pretty, but slick and ready for many more years of use, but I might sell.
That old girl needs.a period correct tang sight.
The Rem pumps I've had/have are as accurate as most bolt guns.I've a 94 Carbine with a Tang...looks great but is it really effective on a Pump action or Lever? they are perhaps a bit tighter than an SKS as far as groupings.
That old girl needs.a period correct tang sight.
The Rem pumps I've had/have are as accurate as most bolt guns.
Shield said their microsight could withstand 458 wm recoil “ absolutely” when I emailed them about it.
Would not fit on a weaver base so I filed and epoxied a pic sight base to a weaver base and put it in the front ring base of a rem model 7. Also had it on the weaver base on a rem 721 for the same sort of thing and the 220 grain loads didn’t bother it.
I had originally bought it to go with a S/S jury 458 wm that was going to finish at 20 inches and a ruger m77 mkII 338 wm. I was ultimately more concerned about any rails available for that rifle than the sight itself.
Vortex venom will work on a weaver base, shield dots are smaller and lower profile but have a thick “ recoil lug” in the middle of the mounting screw that only lets them fit a picatinny.
Using aimpoint mounts and certain sight bases will work for some rifles but position the sight in a forward position. I find on the rear base it’s more like using a peep, depends entirely on the stock I would guess.
I have a Browning BAR that is as accurate if not more accurate than my bolt action in the same caliber. Same with my Ruger no1(2 of them) people always say that they are not as accurate.... well they are as accurate as my bolt action( that said my bolt d’action is no bench rest rifle, just a hunting rifle!! )See...I'm listening to the input. I was under the impression that pumps, levers and semiautomatic's were intristically less accurate than a bolt action.
Regards
Tokguy
You are 100% correct , however the difference is more influenced by person behind the rifle .See...I'm listening to the input. I was under the impression that pumps, levers and semiautomatic's were intristically less accurate than a bolt action.
Regards
Tokguy
You are 100% correct , however the difference is more influenced by person behind the rifle .
The Rem pumps I've had/have are as accurate as most bolt guns.