Opps ! Not 426 BUT 416 ! RJ
I thought it might have been a typo but then I got thinking of the other possibilities lol
Opps ! Not 426 BUT 416 ! RJ
I’ve run ASG 458 310GN very close to that speed. They are a custom bullet and are very long and pointy. Claimed BC sits at .430 and they seem to follow that in real life.
225 FTX (452) at/above that speed with .15” group at 2980 fps. Bullets don’t hold up on impact.
300 barnes copper up to that speed. This is my favourite hunting bullet. Hunting load either 2450 of 2740 fps depending on situation.
No sabots as they can’t handle much above 2600 fps IMO nor did I get accuracy either. Full form rifled bullets only.
There are fellows running 350 GN at 3200 with same barrel, I am not that brave!
I played a lot with the 310 GN in an FTR chassis, model 12 single shot action right port eject, Brux Match 458 barrel with radial brake. It was lots of fun but punishing recoil at higher velocities.
I find it funny that a .416 Rigby doesn't amount to a big bore cartridge as that was the quintessential example I always had in my head when discussing the subject, and due to the immense energy levels that it produces. I suppose I have been conflating big bore and dangerous game rifles and assumed they amounted to one and the same.
I'm curious, where has the >0.45cal criteria been defined as big bore opposed to >0.40?
A lee press and dies will have paid for its self in savings before your first 20 pcs of brass give out.
The 45 caliber rule is very old, back to the days of blackpowder if memory serves. In those days you used a much larger bullet for everything. Rook rifles were 30 caliber and dangerous game rifles really started at 50 caliber and went right up to the 4 and 2 bore. Even in the cordite days the 40s were still considered to be mediums. Now, the 404, 416, 425 are all serious rifles, fit for the fight and with adequate power to pick serious fights with. but the difference between fight-picking and fight-stopping is significant. Some guys, like Finn Aagaard, could use a 375 with a high degree of effectiveness. Likewise Harry Selby did a lot of solid years of work with the 416 Rigby. But by and large you saw 20th century PHs still carrying the 458 Winchester (if they fancied a bolt gun) or a 470, 475 No 2, or 500 Nitro as a rifle for making things as dead as possible, as fast as possible, in really tight quarters.
The argument is almost entirely British. No one gives a damn about American cartridges until the 50s when the 458 Winchester came out up until Roy Weatherby woke up from a fever dream and decided that the 460 Weatherby made sense. The 45-70, 50-90, 45-110 etc were all there for fun and games on the plains. None of that, except for skirmishing with the locals, was particularly dangerous.
The large mediums make a lot more sense, and lack none of the nostalgia, but there is something about a real big fighting rifle.
I'm not convinced about that. I managed to finangle myself into some buffalo culls when government heli-gunning budgets were used up but the population problem remained. I was primarily using a hot loaded .458 Win and there was some concern about what day after day accumulated recoil negative effects would amount to. As a back-up plan I took a #### load of 350 grain TSXs along. Part of that was to drop recoil down to 375 levels; and part was to see to what extent a 458 could be made to fill a 375 role. Long story shortened up a bit; a 458 350 gr mono cranked up is every bit the equal of a 375 with standard weight bullets, at least on thick skinned
heavy animals like Asiatic buffalo which make Capes look like a chew toy for a poodle. Penetration sure wasn't a problem. Observed effects would easily put them as superior.
Now would I use them on a single animal trophy hunt as a first choice? Not likely. An elephant on purpose? Nope. Thin skinned North American game? I'd rather use a 270.
A lee press and dies will have paid for its self in savings before your first 20 pcs of brass give out.
You might break even by the time the first 50 box of bullets is empty.
The rules certainly changed with the advent of good quality smokeless powder. Furthermore I can’t think of a scenario I’d rather be holding a .577 over a .416 on any species.
You'd better hope the first shot with a .577 is bang on because that recoil would make it difficult for an accurate follow up.The rules certainly changed with the advent of good quality smokeless powder. Furthermore I can’t think of a scenario I’d rather be holding a .577 over a .416 on any species.
I had a Ruger No. 1 in 450 NE 3 1/4".
Factory loads meant for double rifles are in 458 Win Mag territory, but the case has a lot of capacity. In the No. 1 I got a 500 grain TSX up to 2450 fps.
That rifle was too light, it only weighed 7.5 lbs as it had a medium profile barrel instead of the tropical profile (Craig Boddington special edition). I put a copper tube full of lead shot in the butt stock and put on a scope to bring it to 9.5 lbs to make it somewhat manageable.
Without the lead tube and scope it was 120 ft-lbf recoil energy. Even with the weight it was still 95.
I wonder if that rifle played a roll in my recent shoulder issues.
I feel like I was on the losing end of prison ### after reading that!
That's the rifle that I wish my #1H 458 was. I've toyed with the idea of reaming the chamber out to 45o NE which, in theory, should be an easy job. But then I'd have to buy another 458 to shoot up all the ammo I have already!
My shoulder is effed too, but that's the fault of a rather large, and very drunk, Chilcotin kid, not my magnum rifles.