I am talking about a high end Zeiss sniper scope vs a Mark 4, not a hunting scope. The guy who paid alot more, much more for his Zeiss than a Mark 4 that went down on the first day of the crse I mentioned would beg to differ. If I got to wait 6 months to get a top of the line spotting scope back for repair, considering what it cost, I would say it's overpriced.
So he should have bought a Night force? Your argument isn't very clear. A Ferrari isn't very good value either, yet I want one. I'd love to some day own the top of the line Zeiss scopes as well. In terms of value some would say that there is no point in buying a MK4 since the NF is close enough in price and better.
I'm sorry I don't care if the warranty takes 2 weeks or 6 months. Either way I'll be ticked off. This is why I only deal with reputable dealers that I trust. I've had one faulty Zeiss Conquest (Yes it's a target scope, not a "military" scope) and it was replaced on the spot. No wait at all.




















































