Leupold warranty

Middle of the country: there are hills, forests, lakes, swamps to miles of fields. I've pitted it against big game in those places and never been disappointed. When you wander outside that criteria, you begin specializing: low magnification, brush. High magnification, long distance varmints: when you factor in size and mass, that small scope makes sense trudging around the mountains. But yes, a fit, excellent shooter capable of humanely shooting a goat over 500y on a mountain hike will already be carrying a heavier 7mm Mag and want a 10x40mm. For comparison, WW2 snipers were using <6x magnification... the soviet PU was a mere 3.5x21 straight tube.

Unfortunately - except older second hand, budget optics are made in the PRC. Simmons used to offer a decent scope that was made in the Philippines... looks like they make crap now. You'll have to do some shopping and look over labels to see. I haven't bought a new scope in years. I'd start looking at Bushnell (some models are still made in Japan) and Burris Signature. Read the boxes and check the scope for country of origin (usually on the bottomside of the turret area.) Japan, you should be pleased; Philippines most likely. Some decent stuff escapes from the PRC, but I'm always skeptical and just avoid it... had a few bad experiences with junk. Leupold doesn't make the VX 1, 2 anymore and the 3HD is just outside your price range. If you get lucky, you might find a new old stock VX1, 2, 3.

Leupold VX3hd just falls outside of your budget: I am skeptical of the cheaper "Freedom" line. I believe some of the Bushnell scopes are still made in Japan, and the Burris Signature might be made in Philippines. Verify though... I haven't bought a new scope in a few years. Bought one chicom scope that flopped, some came on rifles I bought years ago and they were discarded for reliability issues. Vortex makes a Viper HS 2.5-10x44 that is in your budget: I bought one ten years ago which was made in Philippines - a decent optic. Unfortunately it's cheaper now which is dubious, so check. I just avoid chicom scopes for sake of avoiding crap... I'm sure there are some decent offerings, I just don't know what they are.
Do you think the lower end leupold spotter aren’t that great either ? They are china aswell..
 
Do you think the lower end leupold spotter aren’t that great either ? They are china aswell..
I don't know. I bought porro-prism binoculars from Leupold... found they were made in China after. They've been fine and it's been four years if that's any ruler to measure by... they're very clear and comfortable to stare through.
 
Middle of the country: there are hills, forests, lakes, swamps to miles of fields. I've pitted it against big game in those places and never been disappointed. When you wander outside that criteria, you begin specializing: low magnification, brush. High magnification, long distance varmints: when you factor in size and mass, that small scope makes sense trudging around the mountains. But yes, a fit, excellent shooter capable of humanely shooting a goat over 500y on a mountain hike will already be carrying a heavier 7mm Mag and want a 10x40mm. For comparison, WW2 snipers were using <6x magnification... the soviet PU was a mere 3.5x21 straight tube.

Unfortunately - except older second hand, budget optics are made in the PRC. Simmons used to offer a decent scope that was made in the Philippines... looks like they make crap now. You'll have to do some shopping and look over labels to see. I haven't bought a new scope in years. I'd start looking at Bushnell (some models are still made in Japan) and Burris Signature. Read the boxes and check the scope for country of origin (usually on the bottomside of the turret area.) Japan, you should be pleased; Philippines most likely. Some decent stuff escapes from the PRC, but I'm always skeptical and just avoid it... had a few bad experiences with junk. Leupold doesn't make the VX 1, 2 anymore and the 3HD is just outside your price range. If you get lucky, you might find a new old stock VX1, 2, 3.

Leupold VX3hd just falls outside of your budget: I am skeptical of the cheaper "Freedom" line. I believe some of the Bushnell scopes are still made in Japan, and the Burris Signature might be made in Philippines. Verify though... I haven't bought a new scope in a few years. Bought one chicom scope that flopped, some came on rifles I bought years ago and they were discarded for reliability issues. Vortex makes a Viper HS 2.5-10x44 that is in your budget: I bought one ten years ago which was made in Philippines - a decent optic. Unfortunately it's cheaper now which is dubious, so check. I just avoid chicom scopes for sake of avoiding crap... I'm sure there are some decent offerings, I just don't know what they are.
My eyes are getting tired, but with good glass, Ive had zero issues on a Zeiss 1-6, and S&B short dot 1-8 on a animal at 600 yards, no Ive never pulled the trigger in my own ethics bounds, but clear as day and with a proper bullet and cartridge I wouldn't hesitate. the rule of 1x times 100 yards does still work and apply, However to your own eyes and the glass....we are spoiled these days with massive power optics. personally if hunting and not punching paper, chasing groups, the 2-10,2-12,3-10,3-9 is more than enough 400-500 yards. (Ive shot matches with a 2-10 out to 800 yards quite fine) would more mag be better, YOU bet it would. but im also a weight snob.

Im not and never will be a Leopold guy, Ive had so many of the older Gen vx2-3 line and zero issues very simple and incredible optics. However I do think their new lower end lines suffer. the high end lines are amazing at $$$$ but to compare a old gen vx3 to one of their sub 1000$ "hunting" scopes as same same... ya I don't think so. like trucks, appliances etc everything in life quality has gone downhill with everything, to a degree. but the mark 4-5 Line is amazing if you got the $$

I will say however I bought 2, used not sure on age Swarovski z3 4-12 that both had turret issues, I filed a request as used
they sent me postage to fix, I got both back cleaned fixed and looked over at zero cost. I was amazed, I cant speak more highly of them.
and they dont even offer close to the same warranty but they def stand behind their stuff.

If you don't need turrets id say the Z3 line is perfect.

Just my 02c

cheers, fellas!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
My eyes are getting tired, but with good glass, Ive had zero issues on a Zeiss 1-6, and S&B short dot 1-8 on a animal at 600 yards, no Ive never pulled the trigger in my own ethics bounds, but clear as day and with a proper bullet and cartridge I wouldn't hesitate. the rule of 1x times 100 yards does still work and apply, However to your own eyes and the glass....we are spoiled these days with massive power optics. personally if hunting and not punching paper, chasing groups, the 2-10,2-12,3-10,3-9 is more than enough 400-500 yards. (Ive shot matches with a 2-10 out to 800 yards quite fine) would more mag be better, YOU bet it would. but im also a weight snob.

Im not and never will be a Leopold guy, Ive had so many of the older Gen vx2-3 line and zero issues very simple and incredible optics. However I do think their new lower end lines suffer. the high end lines are amazing at $$$$ but to compare a old gen vx3 to one of their sub 1000$ "hunting" scopes as same same... ya I don't think so. like trucks, appliances etc everything in life quality has gone downhill with everything, to a degree. but the mark 4-5 Line is amazing if you got the $$

I will say however I bought 2, used not sure on age Swarovski z3 4-12 that both had turret issues, I filed a request as used
they sent me postage to fix, I got both back cleaned fixed and looked over at zero cost. I was amazed, I cant speak more highly of them.
and they dont even offer close to the same warranty but they def stand behind their stuff.

If you don't need turrets id say the Z3 line is perfect.

Just my 02c

cheers, fellas!
I have a z5 swaro rifle scope and it’s nice . Also very light .
I’m looking for recommendations on a decent spotting scope that’s all. I can’t afford another swaro lol I think they cost even more then the rifle scope to boot
 
Warranty is great, product is mediocre at best. The older set and forget models are known to be the better models but the VX1, freedom, and new VX3HD are low quality, don't track well, zero shifts often enough. This is coming from a guy that was a diehard leupold fan, I've since sold most of them and replaced them with scopes that are actually reliable like Trijicon and S&B.....warranty may be limited on them but at least you know they hold up better.
 
My eyes are getting tired, but with good glass, Ive had zero issues on a Zeiss 1-6, and S&B short dot 1-8 on a animal at 600 yards, no Ive never pulled the trigger in my own ethics bounds, but clear as day and with a proper bullet and cartridge I wouldn't hesitate. the rule of 1x times 100 yards does still work and apply, However to your own eyes and the glass....we are spoiled these days with massive power optics. personally if hunting and not punching paper, chasing groups, the 2-10,2-12,3-10,3-9 is more than enough 400-500 yards. (Ive shot matches with a 2-10 out to 800 yards quite fine) would more mag be better, YOU bet it would. but im also a weight snob.

Im not and never will be a Leopold guy, Ive had so many of the older Gen vx2-3 line and zero issues very simple and incredible optics. However I do think their new lower end lines suffer. the high end lines are amazing at $$$$ but to compare a old gen vx3 to one of their sub 1000$ "hunting" scopes as same same... ya I don't think so. like trucks, appliances etc everything in life quality has gone downhill with everything, to a degree. but the mark 4-5 Line is amazing if you got the $$

I will say however I bought 2, used not sure on age Swarovski z3 4-12 that both had turret issues, I filed a request as used
they sent me postage to fix, I got both back cleaned fixed and looked over at zero cost. I was amazed, I cant speak more highly of them.
and they dont even offer close to the same warranty but they def stand behind their stuff.

If you don't need turrets id say the Z3 line is perfect.

Just my 02c

cheers, fellas!
Pretty much my sentiments. I do miss the old Bushnell Elites, Leupold VX1,2,3, Nikon Monarchs, Zeiss Conquest scopes... even the Terra was nice. Swarovski is expensive but nice. I've never pulled the trigger on a Schmidt and Bender... a whole other price league. But I'll take a Nightforce.

Colonel Cooper told a story about an Israeli tank - apparently the aiming optics had a high magnification so when the tank had a close quarters engagement, the gunner had difficulty aiming since the sight picture was just full of enemy tank, no particular vulnerable point to discern. He compared that to most guys now who plunk their dollars down for large, heavy over magnified and expensive glass. I read that probably back in the late '90s and he was right. Using the heavy target scopes on targets, it's obvious they are not well suited to hunting: you're screwed if you jump a deer at close distance. 2-8x, 3-10x... <45mm objective is more than enough scope for hunting. I used to shoot skeet on occasion, with a combination gun topped with a 2-7x33 Nikon: set on 2x, it really wasn't fair for the skeet but it felt funny doing it especially as it dawned on me that this would be the formula for an older guy who's sight was dimming: most of us will be old guys some day, it's important to remember these adaptations.
 
I have a z5 swaro rifle scope and it’s nice . Also very light .
I’m looking for recommendations on a decent spotting scope that’s all. I can’t afford another swaro lol I think they cost even more then the rifle scope to boot
sorry not much help in the spotter department, I won a zeiss gavia a few years back at a wild life supper raffle, gave it to my pops for sheep hunting. has always been a zeiss guy and actually loves it. not sure on cost these days but on a 25$ ticket it sure was the best win ive had ever.
 
Pretty much my sentiments. I do miss the old Bushnell Elites, Leupold VX1,2,3, Nikon Monarchs, Zeiss Conquest scopes... even the Terra was nice. Swarovski is expensive but nice. I've never pulled the trigger on a Schmidt and Bender... a whole other price league. But I'll take a Nightforce.

Colonel Cooper told a story about an Israeli tank - apparently the aiming optics had a high magnification so when the tank had a close quarters engagement, the gunner had difficulty aiming since the sight picture was just full of enemy tank, no particular vulnerable point to discern. He compared that to most guys now who plunk their dollars down for large, heavy over magnified and expensive glass. I read that probably back in the late '90s and he was right. Using the heavy target scopes on targets, it's obvious they are not well suited to hunting: you're screwed if you jump a deer at close distance. 2-8x, 3-10x... <45mm objective is more than enough scope for hunting. I used to shoot skeet on occasion, with a combination gun topped with a 2-7x33 Nikon: set on 2x, it really wasn't fair for the skeet but it felt funny doing it especially as it dawned on me that this would be the formula for an older guy who's sight was dimming: most of us will be old guys some day, it's important to remember these adaptations.
yeah, I feel you there the older and i mean 25 years ago Zeiss conqest 3-9, 3.5-10 etc gen for 500 usd was sure a steal of a deal.
I mainly run NF now, NXS-NX8 and have a few NX6 on order, for what they are they have never let me down.

Old nikon was awesome as well for the price. Swarovski is great but getting up there in cost/vs options. For the average hunter no turrets yes
start adding options and they become expensive fast, and not to knock their new system of turrets I am sure they are great minus only MOA
I will choose a NF over that.

Im not a 50mm objective guy, I really do prefer a 42-44 as best compromise. my 4-16x42 ATACR is great, It took a while for me to like the 2.5-20x50 nx8 but its also great.

The S&B and even Kahles now.... ya they are priced out to lunch it seems.
 
It was my knowledge that Leupold used glass from Japan. Japan has been producing excellent glass years: Nikon used to make the excellent Monarch, Vortex high end products use glass from Japan, Bushnell etc. I'll take that any day, but Germany makes superb lenses.

Vortex base models are from China: I have never been impressed with anything less than the Viper. Which brings us to the Philippines: The Viper (or some of them) are from the Philippines and I've handled a few from there (and different brand names) that have been very good scopes. I'm not sure there are any glass grinders in North America... except eyeglasses manufacturers.

There isn't any reason why glass couldn't be made here... it's not an industry with any extra regulation. If I had the resources, I'd consider manufacturing the perfect hunting scope: 1" gloss tube, 2-8x36 with German #1, 2, 4 or modified New Camper #4 - interruptions in the thick upright post permitting holdover corrections, or just an exposed micro top turret.
Everyone must have flunked chemistry class. Reason why high end optics are made in Germany and Japan has to do with a special kind of sand only found in those two countries. Cheap optics can be made anywhere if almost the right sand is available but they won't be the same.
 
Everyone must have flunked chemistry class. Reason why high end optics are made in Germany and Japan has to do with a special kind of sand only found in those two countries. Cheap optics can be made anywhere if almost the right sand is available but they won't be the same.
Not only the raw materials but also the production process for fine lenses is the secret.

As a school kid our class visited a Schott factory (trade orientation trip). It was interesting to see at the time. There was one facility we didn't get to see due to restricted access..

In that part of the factory they were "aging" the glass in order to achieve better refractive precision and mediate internal stress in the glass...
 
"Assembled" in the USA is the scam label they use to make their products 300-500% more expensive of what they are actually worth.

Component manufacturing takes place somewhere else, globally.

Now, why one would trust some Oregon hippies to assemble a proper scope is beyond me. Maybe it's the gold ring, like Frodo and the Shire people.
 
So if leupold only warranties electronics for 5 years, how do they determine that? So it’s not transferable and you need to keep your receipt ?

Sounds like a crock of #### to me.
That immediately puts even vortex ahead of leupold these days
 
So if leupold only warranties electronics for 5 years, how do they determine that? So it’s not transferable and you need to keep your receipt ?

Sounds like a crock of #### to me.
That immediately puts even vortex ahead of leupold these days
Ya I have no idea haha… just trying to decide which one to get now and it’s almost like the ford and chev debate , some people like this but other people like that . Regardless everything new under 1000$ is made in china it seems like . So which is best for the money
 
Back
Top Bottom