Low Distance Scope Dilemma, Please Help

[Koshy]

If by "building" they mean "switching reticules", then maybe; otherwise, read this.

I think it means building.. but only they know

Thanks,
- Koshy

 

[redman]

So what's the latest?

 

[Robmcleod82]

I would purchase an anschutz with iron sites and shoot it at 20 and 50 no paralax problems there. Consider the pot stirred......

 

[redman]

Rob, talk about thinking outside the box! That's not a bad idea at all...

 

[Koshy]

I would purchase an anschutz with iron sites and shoot it at 20 and 50 no paralax problems there. Consider the pot stirred......

That is what I shot for a few years, so is probably what I will end up doing

Thanks,
- Koshy

 

[rnbra-shooter]

If you do want to go with a scope for short-range - get a set of rings for it. It's a lot easier to attach/detach a scope+rings to a base, than to open up rings, remove scope, replace with another scope, re-affix rings.

I don't know what kind of bases and rings you ended up settling on, but many kinds of base+ring systems allow for very good return-to-zero (except for the "Redfield" system, with its two "windage screws" at the rear ring).

 

[Koshy]

If you do want to go with a scope for short-range - get a set of rings for it. It's a lot easier to attach/detach a scope+rings to a base, than to open up rings, remove scope, replace with another scope, re-affix rings.

I don't know what kind of bases and rings you ended up settling on, but many kinds of base+ring systems allow for very good return-to-zero (except for the "Redfield" system, with its two "windage screws" at the rear ring).

Thanks for the input, that was the plan

If I am looking for quick release it would be LaRue and have a buddy send them to me from from the States...

If I was looking for something a little more "solid" would have to be NEAR.

Thanks,
- Koshy