M10X Canadian MSRP set

So assumptions. Ever ask M+M?

Of all the parties involved in this, that ####ing scumbag is the last ####ing ####### I would take at his word. I KNOW it would be a load of #### out of his mouth, he's already lied several times in public on FB to the whopping 3000 followers he has.
I have been following his FB bull#### from the start BTW. No assumptions needed there. Lying worthless piece of ####.

PS...your strange M&M nut gobbling is creeping me out now.
 
How about common sense?

Misrepresented product, lies in advertising, bad packaging causing damage, fraud = negative rating.
Backing out of the deal, bad communications, delayed shipping, but goods are as advertised = neutral rating.
the retailer changing a customers feedback so others think they are good = someone not worth doing business with because they are dishonest
 
the retailer changing a customers feedback so others think they are good = someone not worth doing business with because they are dishonest


Well they are using the EE rulebook, which states that if you do not have an actual delivery date to the day, you cannot leave a negative reply. As if people on EE can guarantee you an actual delivery date. Even if so, why are the sponsors allowed to do pre-sales if they do not know an actual delivery date? I guess as long as they pay their sponsorship fees they can do what they want even if not in their paid forum section. We all know Admins/Moderators have been cleaning up threads left and center, closing them to all at the request of paying business.


"Negative feedback can only be left by the buyer in the following circumstances:

There must be an agreed date of delivery before funds are accepted, and the delivery date is not met; It is the responsibility of the buyer to obtain a date of delivery before sending funds;
Items delivered do not agree to the conditions posted;"
 
Last edited:
There was a feedback thread started by one of the many disgruntled m&m preorder group. When the date was questioned, the thread was promptly closed. Considering they’re never coming, I’d say late December was close enough for a date. That’s assuming common sense is involved.
 
Well they are using the EE rulebook, which states that if you do not have an actual delivery date to the day, you cannot leave a negative reply. As if people on EE can guarantee you an actual delivery date. Even if so, why are the sponsors allowed to do pre-sales if they do not know an actual delivery date? I guess as long as they pay their sponsorship fees they can do what they want even if not in their paid forum section. We all know Admins/Moderators have been cleaning up threads left and center, closing them to all at the request of paying business.


"Negative feedback can only be left by the buyer in the following circumstances:

There must be an agreed date of delivery before funds are accepted, and the delivery date is not met; It is the responsibility of the buyer to obtain a date of delivery before sending funds;
Items delivered do not agree to the conditions posted;"

The presale has nothing to do with the EE or its rules
 
M&M clearly is since they were not below MAP pricing in the US, if they even had MAP pricing which I also doubt...the MSRP was $1250 but places were selling them as low as $999. If the MAP is $999 then $1450 was not below it was it?
Still lots of time for M&M to #### over NS....just wait and see what else that POS snake can come up with.

Hitzy,

There's no doubt in my mind M+M are lying.

Wanstall's might want to consider proving M+M lied to them though to take any heat of them.
 
Well not according to the rules.

If you are not given a delivery date (not month, but an actual day,month,year) you cannot leave negative feedback. Then why are dealers even allowed to do pre-orders on here?

Because $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

CGN charges 5 digits to be a dealer here

Shawn
 
Of all the parties involved in this, that ####ing scumbag is the last ####ing ####### I would take at his word. I KNOW it would be a load of #### out of his mouth, he's already lied several times in public on FB to the whopping 3000 followers he has.
I have been following his FB bull#### from the start BTW. No assumptions needed there. Lying worthless piece of ####.

PS...your strange M&M nut gobbling is creeping me out now.

I agree with Hitzy, how many times did M&M lie and change the story? If he was pinochio his nose would be the size of a power pole
How could anyone believe a word that comes out of his mouth
I decided to buy another type 81 instead of his offering
 
Boy the wool is thick over some peoples eyes.

I know everyone wants to blame America, but you really should talk to all parties involved, then you will quickly figure out who's story doesn't add up. That is if you are unwilling to believe that CanAm solely imported the sample and carried the rifle through the FRT process alone which is a proven fact taken from the FRT table itself. The other parties claiming they had their hands in/were invested in the process lied, and from the sounds of it, that is just the tip
 
Boy the wool is thick over some peoples eyes.

I know everyone wants to blame America, but you really should talk to all parties involved, then you will quickly figure out who's story doesn't add up. That is if you are unwilling to believe that CanAm solely imported the sample and carried the rifle through the FRT process alone which is a proven fact taken from the FRT table itself. The other parties claiming they had their hands in/were invested in the process lied, and from the sounds of it, that is just the tip

that is right the other parties not only one ... i believe what Canam told me when it was time and what they release in a thread before it was locked. the rest is history. people should not blame only mms but all the other parties that tried to bypass canam on that one. for what at the end?
 
Back
Top Bottom