Apparently it's difficult to read between the lines. Let me make it clear. Having handled MH and MV rifles I am not impressed. Proprietary parts,
The MH, and MV where always very clear that they were mostly proprietary by design to ensure the desired classification.
often machined from low end DPMS components is not what I call a quality rifle.
Other than the BCG which was no secret, what else was DPMS? You realize you can upgrade BCG if you wanted right?
The asking price was ridiculous
Thats a matter of opinion. It was steep no question, but its not to far out of line from what a similar build on BILLIT AR10 reciever set would cost. Its a little steeper to cover R&D and the limited amount of production due to our miniscule market.
and the refusal to set receiver sets under the BS excuse of "classification issues" only made it worse.
They refused to sell stripped reciever sets of the MH/MV because they are so proprietary that they would have basiclly been complete less the barrel, furniture, and buffer components, and because their liability insurance wont cover them for selling incompleted rifles that use proprietary parts more than just the reciever shape.
Now that someone else(MDI) has tabled a non res AR-esq receiver set ATRS miraculously is able to offer sets as well.
ATRS was actually on this long before MDI made their product known. Myself and several others not part of ATRS staff have been in the know since before all of the 1st run of MV had been released. How else could they be so far along in production that they have nearly passed MDI? Haha
My experiences with ATRS have been good.
Then leave it at that and stop recycling bull#### you hear at the range. You have likely heard one very biased side of the story. If that person feels the need to talk #### than let them, but for you to say so with out any supporting evidence makes you look like a shill, as seen below here.
The experiences from friends and others(to include businesses) I know have been horrible. Poor service, poor products and outright lies were the common theme. Again, those comments are coming from others experiences not mine. Sinasta apparently has had poor dealings with ATRS as well.
I am a repeat customer of ATRS and one of their biggest critics of the proprietary nature of the MH & MV design (I had both knew what they were but also how they could be better!). Rick and I have butted heads a couple times on the forums to the point where he requested I call him so he could explain things to me that were best left off of the forum. He has earned my respect despite the odd set-to that we have had. I got to hold my MS on thursday when I paid for the lower, must say this reciever set will exceed most folks expectations. No proprietary parts and no goofy 10/22-esq take down bolts.
In my mind, AB blaster is a shill if not Wyat himself. He bashes products he doesnt own and uses "freinds" experience's to rip into atrs with no real accountability or credibility for the words spoken.