Mag panic buy situation

Suther said:
Yeah but that begs the question of when after? It also begs the question of how long will they let things slide? For instance, the handgun freeze could have been brought into force sooner than they did. Will the same happen with this? Nobody knows.

If you've got the money and want mags then buy them now, because once they drop the regulation changes the market will go crazy, and with it some shops will start gouging (not saying TNA will, but we all saw what happened with handgun prices in some shops).
Click to expand...

My guess is they'll do it quietly via OIC over the Christmas holidays.
 
soulchaser said:
My guess is they'll do it quietly via OIC over the Christmas holidays.
Click to expand...

Can they OIC regulation changes? I have no idea. The handgun freeze wasn't done via OIC but I have no idea if that was because they couldn't, or just that they didn't want to.

My understanding from the handgun freeze is that regulation changes get tabled, then there is a 30 sitting day waiting period, then the regulations can be brought into effect. (They can also be brought into effect sooner if both houses vote on them in committees.) I think the final mechanism that brings the regulations into effect is an OIC but I could be wrong on that. I'm also not sure if this is the only way to change regulations.
 
Last edited:
The problem is, these are converted mags. Need to be newly manufactured with a rivet by the manufacturer with the intent to only ever hold 5 rounds. Not 3rd party converted from intending to hold 30 or more to only 5.
 
Who couldn't see this coming?
Originally mags were supposed to be permanently altered and the rivet/pin was a bandaid that surprisingly even lasted this long
 
Who cares, at this point? The writing is on the wall. They want ALL the guns. They’ll keep doing stuff like this as long as we keep tolerating it. It’s too bad we don’t have a voice for Canadian gun owners to speak out against this crap. All we have are grifters and cucks that lose like gentlemen every time and pretend that they’ll succeed next time if only you give them more money.
 
Exactly and anyone who thinks Pierre pollieve is going to save us is delusional….we can’t vote our way out of corruption
 
I purchased my guns and magazines legally.

I’ve done nothing wrong, and I wont accept punishment meant for those that did.

As an aboriginal LEO I’ll use my discretion, and I won’t be enforcing laws made by the laurentian elite 3,500km away who have no idea, or care, what my rural community wants or needs.

If Ottawa doesn’t want guns or magazines, they can make everything East of Manitoba a gun free zone.

Then the Liberal voting cucks, and their feminist vegan partners can all feel safer, as they sip Sauvignon blanc, over their white shag carpet, and muse about me and my community as “the unsettled savages out west”.
 
I think everyone needs to call the RCMP and report the federal offense this liberal ass pirate journalist openly committed and documented to try and attack gun owners again that done nothing but follow the law.

We all need to raise hell and make this ########ERS life miserable. If he want to break the law he must pay too
 
I guess it's ok to commit, document and brag
About commiting a federal offense as long as you're writing a liberal anti gun article about it.
If any of use popped a river and write propaganda saying so then turned that mag over we would be in cuffs. So should this filthy little liberal mouth piece

Raise hell guy RAISE HELL
 
derek2007 said:
I think everyone needs to call the RCMP and report the federal offense this liberal ass pirate journalist openly committed and documented to try and attack gun owners again that done nothing but follow the law.

We all need to raise hell and make this ########ERS life miserable. If he want to break the law he must pay too
Click to expand...

In theory I agree with you, but then again I can contemplate another side of this. That is, what this journalist did was prove how ridiculous the law is.

Also, that nobody has kicked his front door down shows that LEO’s are mostly unwilling to enforce silly laws, so long as nobody is hurt, and the intent to commit a violent offense wasn’t present.

Laying a charge on someone for removing a pin from a magazine, for a story, is as silly as charging a person who’s removed a pin to clean his magazine. Without intent to commit an offense, why lay a charge?

Justice is more than a rule book.

Justice is taking in the totality of circumstance.

We need not encourage the RCMP to be mindless borg who lay charge for everything. There are enough of them that do already. Also, there are many that have more life experience and reason then others - the good ones.
 
JeffMan said:
In theory I agree with you, but then again I can contemplate another side of this. That is, what this journalist did was prove how ridiculous the law is.

Also, that nobody has kicked his front door down shows that LEO’s are mostly unwilling to enforce silly laws, so long as nobody is hurt, and the intent to commit a violent offense wasn’t present.

Laying a charge on someone for removing a pin from a magazine, for a story, is as silly as charging a person who’s removed a pin to clean his magazine. Without intent to commit an offense, why lay a charge?

Justice is more than a rule book.

Justice is taking in the totality of circumstance.

We need not encourage the RCMP to be mindless borg who lay charge for everything. There are enough of them that do already. Also, there are many that have more life experience and reason then others - the good ones.
Click to expand...

This is a good point. If this individual openly broke the law, wrote an article about, has likely had people reporting him, and they aren’t doing anything about it… shows how much they really care.
 
I think this will effect pretty well every single gun owner I know. anybody who was already frustrated but not doom and gloom is gonna be pushed over the edge of frustration into the realm of total non compliance
 
Suther said:
Lets take their word on this for a sec and assume this actually is for public safety. They ban all mags over 5 so criminals can't walk into a store and buy mags then unpin them. How does the fact that gun owners have a bunch of these mags make any difference? You gonna start selling your now-prohibited magazines on the streets?
Click to expand...

They are not only worried about new purchases by criminals, but that we PAL holders are all potential criminals, and one day any of us may suddenly decide to unpin our mags for criminal intent.

JeffMan said:
In theory I agree with you, but then again I can contemplate another side of this. That is, what this journalist did was prove how ridiculous the law is.

Also, that nobody has kicked his front door down shows that LEO’s are mostly unwilling to enforce silly laws, so long as nobody is hurt, and the intent to commit a violent offense wasn’t present.

Laying a charge on someone for removing a pin from a magazine, for a story, is as silly as charging a person who’s removed a pin to clean his magazine. Without intent to commit an offense, why lay a charge?

Justice is more than a rule book.

Justice is taking in the totality of circumstance.

We need not encourage the RCMP to be mindless borg who lay charge for everything. There are enough of them that do already. Also, there are many that have more life experience and reason then others - the good ones.
Click to expand...

If intent to commit an offense with a prohibited item was the basis for charges, then we should be allowed to unpin all of our mags and have full autos because we don't plan to commit crimes with them. As is, the crime is possession of a prohibited item, and the journalist intentionally broke that law, thereby committing a criminal act. I'd wager both my feet that if RCMP happened to walk in your home while you had some unpinned mags on your work bench for cleaning, you would certainly be charged for each of them.
 
JACKSMYDOG said:
I'd wager both my feet that if RCMP happened to walk in your home while you had some unpinned mags on your work bench for cleaning, you would certainly be charged for each of them.
Click to expand...

Maybe, but I doubt it.

I’ve been a cop for 18 years and I can only speak to what I would do.
 
The other fake ass lie is how they claim to buy these in Facebook marketplace. That's for sure bull#### as my wife's has a seller's account and we can even post a gun case without threat of banning. More liberal pussies and lies as usual.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom