Slide lock and bolt releases on guns can be reached by lefties as well as righties equally well.
Your talk of tactics is awesome except cover isn't always available and trying to pretend that running a charging handle or slide is 100% effective when it isn't is ridiculous. Otherwise people wouldn't have IA's to deal with problems that arise from them.
I guess what it comes down to is that your experience level doesn't convince any of us that you actually know what your talking about. Especially in light of the fact that so many Pros, be they cops, soldiers or competitors disagree with you. And not just on this forum.
As a right handed shooter how do I access the slide lock on a SIG P226? How would I do it as a lefty? How about the slide lock on an HK P7? What about weaker shooters who don't possess the finger strength to operate a slide lock? What about a left handed shooter firing dominant only, how does he/she solve a type one stoppage or reload with the slide lock?
You're right, cover isn't always available but it should be sought out and utilized whenever possible.
IA's are practiced to solve stoppages of the system, not charge handle or slide lock "induced" problems. Do explain how a charge handle that is non reciprocating can cause a stoppage?? Same question for the slide lock.
The BC and SL are both part of the IA process but both rely on the use of the CH and slide to perform their function first. You can't lock the bolt back without using the CH. You can't lock the slide to the rear without racking the slide to the rear. So which control cycles the action 100% of the time? It isn't the BC or slide lock. A type 2 or 3 stoppage is not caused by the CH or slide.
Again I ask, how does being a "pro" automatically translate into being an SME who knows "THE" way to operate a system? Who/what determines what level of experience is required to be considered either a "pro" or SME??
Last I checked, LEO's qualify annually and use their firearms rarely on the job. I guess that means they shoot paper just like competitors and enthusiasts do. To the best of my knowledge LEO's re-qualify, but never receive ongoing training or advanced tactics. I believe they shoot at ridiculously oversized targets that represent a small portion of the populace as well.
Soldiers receive the "gunfighter" training as part of their workup for a tour overseas. To the best of my knowledge this course has only been offered for less than a decade, so what were soldiers taught before that? I don't know if the "C7 rifle series" videos I watched are still in use but they're far from cutting edge and the methods are dated... About 1965 dated. Up until the mission in Afghanistan Canada had been involved in very few conflicts where shots were fired.
Competitors shoot paper as well. They also don't utilize cover or other live preserving tactics. Their gear is selected and setup to maximize speed not practicality, the range is flat and clear of debris and a walk through is often possible prior to the shoot.
So which criteria best reflects real world factors and by default makes one a "PRO" or SME?? The only common denominator I see is that they're all paid.
TDC
ETA: No disrespect to LEO's or MIL personnel. I strongly believe you folks receive the short end of the stick with regards to training and equipment. Both areas are under funded and under manned.























































