Make your Kel Tec CMR30 Non Restricted with our conversion kit. 50.00USD

IRUNGUNS

IRUNGUNS

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Business Member
Rating - 100%
189   0   0
cmr stock.jpg

Kit includes

1, NR Carbon Fiber Canadian compliant stock and front sling attachment. The stock is a perfect fit with the ability to attach a sling.

You will need to remove the rear pin to interchange the stocks. You will receive everything you need to make your Kel-Tec CRM-30 non restricted.

Once the new stock and sling adaptor are installed you will need to have an RCMP verifier make the necessary changes with the Canadian Firearms Program to have your new CMR-30 Non Restricted and removed from the registry.

Please click picture for link to site
 

Attachments

  • cmr stock.jpg
    cmr stock.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 3,775
Last edited:
I always thought that for making a restricted firearm non restricted it was everything about the barrel length and nothing about adding a different stock for classification change ?

Maybe things have changed, I remember many years ago a fellow at the club was trying to change something to do with the stock on a Calico M-900 to save it from going prohib, I never did end up hearing the outcome on that one.
 
Ipscshooters said:
I always thought that for making a restricted firearm non restricted it was everything about the barrel length and nothing about adding a different stock for classification change ?

Maybe things have changed, I remember many years ago a fellow at the club was trying to change something to do with the stock on a Calico M-900 to save it from going prohib, I never did end up hearing the outcome on that one.
Click to expand...

This is Rim Fire, different set of rules.
 
This is 3D printed, it’s a bit disingenuous to call it carbon fibre even if it is printed with chopped carbon fibre in the filament. At the end of the day it is a 3D printed plastic stock.
 
At the end of the day it's a very well done 3D printed stock. If we made it out of hemp we would advertise it as such. You can always go purchase a 400.00 barrel conversion kit and achieve the same outcome.

Keep in mind it was a very lengthy process to have this stock approved by the RCMP and as such your RCMP verifier will need the letter that will accompany said stock and sling mount to have your firearm reclassified as Non Restricted and removed from the registry.


The IRUNGUNS Team




misterplinker1 said:
This is 3D printed, it’s a bit disingenuous to call it carbon fibre even if it is printed with chopped carbon fibre in the filament. At the end of the day it is a 3D printed plastic stock.
Click to expand...
 
Rpm_machine said:
Does this letter comes with the purchased stocks to make the process easier to have verified ?
Click to expand...

Is RCMP verification a legal requirement? I don’t see anywhere that it is. Once the stock is installed you call them and inform them of the classification change. The firearm meets the definition of NR no matter what. Am I missing something? Or are they asking for something that is not legally required?
 
Yes it does. The stock had to be approved by the RCMP in order to have the rifle recertified as Non Restricted before they will remove it from the registry. That is why there is a letter that was provided from Inspection Services, it verifies it is an approved stock allowing for reclassification.


The IRUNGUNS Team
 
IRUNGUNS said:
Yes it does. The stock had to be approved by the RCMP in order to have the rifle recertified as Non Restricted before they will remove it from the registry. That is why there is a letter that was provided from Inspection Services, it verifies it is an approved stock allowing for reclassification.


The IRUNGUNS Team
Click to expand...
I don’t see where it says that in the firearms act. It clearly defines what a NR and if a firearm meets those criteria it is NR. I don’t think you could be charged with anything if the firearm wet the definition of NR
 
You take that thought and run with it. When they don't remove it from the registry you can launch a class action law suit when they catch you on crown land with it and criminally charge you.

Then, you can open your wallet, litigate the matter and try and justify your statement, in the process you will most likely lose all your firearms. That would not be a hill I would want to die on for a 50.00 investment. It's people with your thought process that make things more difficult for the rest of us.

If you don't want to be compliant don't buy it.




The IRUNGUNS Team


Bobbydigital said:
I don’t see where it says that in the firearms act. It clearly defines what a NR and if a firearm meets those criteria it is NR. I don’t think you could be charged with anything if the firearm wet the definition of NR
Click to expand...
 
Bobbydigital said:
Is RCMP verification a legal requirement? I don’t see anywhere that it is. Once the stock is installed you call them and inform them of the classification change. The firearm meets the definition of NR no matter what. Am I missing something? Or are they asking for something that is not legally required?
Click to expand...

If you want the rifles registration removed from the registry as a restricted firearm, verification is required
 
Bobbydigital said:
I don’t see where it says that in the firearms act. It clearly defines what a NR and if a firearm meets those criteria it is NR. I don’t think you could be charged with anything if the firearm wet the definition of NR
Click to expand...

In the end, you may walk away without a criminal charge, but it is the lengthy process to get there and the costs incurred that are the issue.

The government loves to use "punishment by process" if you have not been a victim of this, i can understand why you think the way you do.
 
Ya stop the bashing
There are people that care to have NR and not on the registry.

There are plenty of restricted 16" versions. Go buy that..
 
IRUNGUNS said:
You take that thought and run with it. When they don't remove it from the registry you can launch a class action law suit when they catch you on crown land with it and criminally charge you.

Then, you can open your wallet, litigate the matter and try and justify your statement, in the process you will most likely lose all your firearms. That would not be a hill I would want to die on for a 50.00 investment. It's people with your thought process that make things more difficult for the rest of us.

If you don't want to be compliant don't buy it.




The IRUNGUNS Team
Click to expand...

So no, it's not a legal requirement and the scenario you described is completely hypothetical. Perhaps a well informed officer takes out a tape measure and figures out that it indeed meets the definition of NR and you are on your merry way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom