Modern rifles/platforms in 6.5x55

And the ongame performance of the 100 gr TTSX?

I did load and shoot the 120 gr Ballistic Tip, but did not shoot any game with so cannot say how it performed...although I am sure that it would have been fine on deer. Do not recall load at this time or accuracy results.
 
It was a bit fragile although did lead to very quick kills...the 120gr BT that is. Then again I was puttin it through shoulders, or rather shoulder. Bet if it was a shot that didn't connect with shoulder it would do just fine and exit but these ones seem to have come apart.

I only have pictures of one 100gr TTSX kill but it opens fast, tears things up well, and if you hit bone all the more so. Some folks here have also posted about it having been quite effective for moose from 260 Rem.

It is of course not so efficient at hanging onto that velocity/energy past 200 yards but thats rarely a worry of mine.

20221110-104911-resized.jpg


20221110-102046-resized.jpg
 
The hydrostatic shock of that bullet when encountering bone is something else. Have found similar results on smaller big game such as mountain sheep with the 140 gr partitions at a factory rated 2780 fps (Norma ammunition). Quick, clean kills.
Other benefit is being able to anchor an animal on steep hillsides so they don't roll to the bottom of the mountain or ravine requiring extra work to recover the animal.
Only complaint would be the meat loss from the bloodshot area...not so bad if just ribs, but the higher shoulder shot does lose more meat from the front end of the backstraps, and the shoulder(s).
But there is a balance point here, and if you aren't willing to cross that point, you have to wait for a different shot opportunity.
 
That was exactly my gripe with it too. I'll probably make sure to rib the next one if I do it again. If.

It must be...a story to tell...recovering animals in terrain like that when it doesn't go "just so".
 
That was exactly my gripe with it too. I'll probably make sure to rib the next one if I do it again. If.

It must be...a story to tell...recovering animals in terrain like that when it doesn't go "just so".

Sturdier bullet; heavier jacketed H frame bullet or possibly a monolithic solid or HP?
 
Sturdier bullet; heavier jacketed H frame bullet or possibly a monolithic solid or HP?

Aye sir. I bet the 160gr RNs you use would be perfect, or a 155 Mega. I have a thing for monos so I might go with the 140gr ECX.
 
Had a modern Howa in 6.5x55, shot fine, just didn't go together right for me lol.
Still have HVA 1600 and a PH Lightweight 98, bunch of S&L target rifles built off K98's, it's a nice cartridge to load and shoot.
 
I’ve touched on this earlier: the one negative plaguing the 6.5 Swede is that it is normally under-loaded. American factory loads are very wimpy; the European factory loads are a little more powerful, but still somewhat under-loaded. This state of affairs stems from the CIP and SAAMI pressure standards. The European CIP maximum pressure standard is 55,114 piezo PSI for modern firearms. However, it’s hard to see the logic in this as the corresponding pressure standards are 60,191 PSI for the .260 Rem. and 63,091 PSI for the 6.5 Creedmoor. Although CIP cites its 6.5x55 standard for modern firearms, it seems to be driven down by the knowledge that there are all those old military 6.5 Swede rifles out there—the Mauser 94/96s and others—even though, for those rifles, the CIP standard is too high.

According the CIP, if you have a 6.5 Creedmoor, which can be safely loaded to 63,091 PSI, and you rebarrel that action to 6.5x55, you shouldn’t load to that pressure any more. Since the action hasn’t changed, this makes little sense to me.

I suspect that it isn’t just factory-load shooters who’ve been affected by this anomaly, but also handloaders held back by loading data provided by the bullet and powder makers who seem to hold their published maximum loads down to the 55,114 PSI standard.
 
I’ve touched on this earlier: the one negative plaguing the 6.5 Swede is that it is normally under-loaded. American factory loads are very wimpy; the European factory loads are a little more powerful, but still somewhat under-loaded. This state of affairs stems from the CIP and SAAMI pressure standards. The European CIP maximum pressure standard is 55,114 piezo PSI for modern firearms. However, it’s hard to see the logic in this as the corresponding pressure standards are 60,191 PSI for the .260 Rem. and 63,091 PSI for the 6.5 Creedmoor. Although CIP cites its 6.5x55 standard for modern firearms, it seems to be driven down by the knowledge that there are all those old military 6.5 Swede rifles out there—the Mauser 94/96s and others—even though, for those rifles, the CIP standard is too high.

According the CIP, if you have a 6.5 Creedmoor, which can be safely loaded to 63,091 PSI, and you rebarrel that action to 6.5x55, you shouldn’t load to that pressure any more. Since the action hasn’t changed, this makes little sense to me.

I suspect that it isn’t just factory-load shooters who’ve been affected by this anomaly, but also handloaders held back by loading data provided by the bullet and powder makers who seem to hold their published maximum loads down to the 55,114 PSI standard.

Didn't Hornady produce some light Magnum loads for the 6.5x55? I don't recall any chronograph results though. - dan
 
Didn't Hornady produce some light Magnum loads for the 6.5x55? I don't recall any chronograph results though. - dan

Hornady did have a line of their Light Magnum loads, but these have been replaced by the Hornady Superformance line. These loads supposedly use a specially-developed Superformance powder and are supposed to goose muzzle velocities by 100-200 fps, but the figure they give for the 6.5x55 140-grain SST bullet is just 2735 fps--pretty mild and well below what's possible via handloading.
 
Ha! Yes I’m very proud of my primers.

Hahaha nothing says "SAAMI? We don't need no steenkin' SAAMI" like a pic of one of those traumatized mofos in its casing next to a game animal lol.
 
Last edited:
I would check out Intersurplus and Frontier Outfitters for a Husqvarna chambered in 6.5x55. You will find a used Husqvarna for under 600.00 and it will be a much better built rifle than almost anything commercially made now days. I have a Ruger, Lakelander, Husqvarna, and 2 Zastava's chambered in 6.5x55. They are all great guns but the Husqvarna in a lightweight carbine and the one Zastava that has a shortened 19" barrel have become my favorites for hunting. Don't let anyone talk you into anything else 6.5 because you will get all the satisfaction you want from a 6.5x55 and remember that pretty much everything 6.5 was copied from the venerable 6.5 Swede. The grand daddy of the 6.5 chamberings. Good luck and have fun with whatever you get. It is an awesome caliber.

I have bought several nice old Husqvarna rifles from Frontier, mostly in 30-06, 8x57, and a couple in 6.5x55.
 
The 260/6.5CM is more for less. Same in a long action; the 270 or 25/06. The 7x57 or 6.5x55 crowd is there for mostly nostalgia not performance, value or ease imo.

Its pricks 6.5 Swede owners to hear that, but it’s true. I really like my T3 6.5x55 and I think the cartridge is great ITO case capacity, accuracy, performance etc. For a cartridge designed in the late 1890s it was light years ahead and applied the shorter case and longer OAL concept that many modern offerings do. However, it gets imbued with misty eyed romance and myth that just about defies the laws of physics. There are a few good modern offerings in the 6.5x55SE, but way more in 6.5CM, from ultralights to heavy precision rigs, from $500-$5000+. Tons of factory loads, modern specs, and load data, etc.

I will hang onto my 6.5x55 for now, because it works well, but if I was looking for a new mid-capacity 6.5mm offering that was going to be shot a lot, I would probably choose the obvious advantages of 6.5CM.
 
I'd rather buy a husqvarna vs a zastava. Just bought a RH 30-06 and the smoothness of the bolt is much nicer then the zastava. I think if you can find a zastava for reasonable price then do some smoothing of the action it would be pretty good.
 
I'd rather buy a husqvarna vs a zastava. Just bought a RH 30-06 and the smoothness of the bolt is much nicer then the zastava. I think if you can find a zastava for reasonable price then do some smoothing of the action it would be pretty good.

I bet the holes for scope bases line up, the iron sights are pretty straight, and they work great with a full mag too! lol
 
Back
Top Bottom