I'm curious about what getting rid of the quick detach barrel option would do? Remove some weight?
I'm slowly being convinced that an ACR is going to be my .223 NR platform...
A guy on the ACR forum is making non QD trunions for the ACR


I'm curious about what getting rid of the quick detach barrel option would do? Remove some weight?
I'm slowly being convinced that an ACR is going to be my .223 NR platform...
RPM's hand guard is also lighter than the Plastic malpul one and way slimmer. His hand guard was one of the big reasons I kept my ACR. and everyone that shoots my ACR are blown away buy how much nicer it feels with a few simple upgrades.
I handled a DMR version and I wanted to cry... That rifle is totally off balance and is pretty much a bench only rifle.
Once Im done my 102 build. Ill be looking at getting a custom lightweight barrel for my ACR and getting rid of the quick detach barrel option.
How would the DMR version balance without that horrid railed handguard and with an extended RPM handguard?
Anyway,lets move on and get back on track,shall we?
So , OP, have you decided yet?
Well after reading the comments and getting more info from this thread I've decided I'd rather keep my mv. Atrs was pretty excellent to deal with when I bought the rifle. And I have no doubt they would help me out if I needed it. I must say I am proud to own this Canadian made riflethough I'm still eyeing that acr and really like everything I'm hearing about it.
Well after reading the comments and getting more info from this thread I've decided I'd rather keep my mv. Atrs was pretty excellent to deal with when I bought the rifle. And I have no doubt they would help me out if I needed it. I must say I am proud to own this Canadian made riflethough I'm still eyeing that acr and really like everything I'm hearing about it.
Keep your eye out on EE ive snagged 2 NR ACR'S for cheap. One at 1750 3 years back and one this summer for 1800...At those prices it well worth it and you can upgrade everything and still be under what they cost new.
Sorry to hear that.
They need a small business consultant to come in and fix this. Eliminate this whole "built to order" model because it's clearly not working with 12 month lead times. Pick just two versions of each gun, a lightweight and target model for the MV and MH. Stock the parts, build the guns, put them on the shelf and lower the price because you just saved money via economies of scale. If people want to change barrels or whatever the hell, let the aftermarket handle it.
People want to support Canadian businesses, they're just making it incredibly hard to do.
Well after reading the comments and getting more info from this thread I've decided I'd rather keep my mv. Atrs was pretty excellent to deal with when I bought the rifle. And I have no doubt they would help me out if I needed it. I must say I am proud to own this Canadian made riflethough I'm still eyeing that acr and really like everything I'm hearing about it.
I support Canadian manufacturers
I have ATRS rings on my rifles and use their mags, I also have Cadex, S&J, TacOrd , RPM, Solely Canadian and Ferro Concept. (im sure im forgetting a few ) I would love to own a MV but it doesn't fit my needs unfortunately. Would be a shame to beat the crap of a MV during training.
doesnt work for me either, he's not aloneIt may not work for you but it appears to be working for most people.
Why ,is the ACR that much tougher?
I support Canadian manufacturers
I have ATRS rings on my rifles and use their mags, I also have Cadex, S&J, TacOrd , RPM, Solely Canadian and Ferro Concept. (im sure im forgetting a few ) I would love to own a MV but it doesn't fit my needs unfortunately. Would be a shame to beat the crap of a MV during training.
I think he means it would be a shame to be so hard on such fine craftsmanship.
Why ,is the ACR that much tougher?
Yup. Training isnt show and tell. No one cares what rifle you have as long as it shoots and provides good cover fire.
Well as I stated before I run cheap steel case 556. not something I would want to run in a cuatom gun.
it would be a shame to beat it up in a way. But I'm sure as hell theres a lot of guys that would like to see how much abuse the rifle can take. It's a similar platform as the ar bust is it just as "reliable"
As it should be.I have full confidence that it can perform as good as any AR configured to the same spec. (Lilja or proof barrels, Timney trigger, JP SCS).
Its easy to forget that the only non-AR parts are the upper and lower, and charging handle.