Actually you explained not much , you have however trashed someone else ..... 35 pages worth, and anyone else that didn't agree with you. Live and let live ....... here let me explain it to you , you have your ethics, he has his , i have mine , etc...... each of us has the RIGHT to decide for ourself what is/isn't ethical, right ? so what is ethical for you isn't necessarily for me, qwith me here ? doesn't make you right or wrong , doesn't make him right or wrong , each of us has their own interpretation , , it's not rocket science here . I personally believe that to each their own, , some believe high fence hunting is wrong , so do i, UNLESS there are a few thousand acres for X animals and X hunters , if the animal can fairly elude and get rest and relax for a few days I think it's ok, others think no way any way . See what I mean ? you believe the shot shouldn't have been done , so do a few others , whereas a few agree , he did good , and it seems thru 35 pages , so did a few others. y'all made your points , nobody is going to change their opinions . Yall are beating a dead horse , to pulp ! Ethical , schmethical , the beast is dead , nobody ran thru the forest looking for wounded beasties , all ends well. It doesn't always end well , on a close shot either , and folks chase beasties thru the forest , was that less ethical ? or more ethical ? To each their own, live and let live ! get it now ?????