More Load Testing In My 12FV

mmattockx

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
100   0   0
As a follow up to my first thread on load testing with my 12FV in 22-250:

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=459391

Conditions finally coincided with my time and I got out friday night to test some refined loads with IMR4064 and a first run with IMR4895. Both loads used a 50gr. V-Max bullet and an OAL of 2.450". Testing was done at 200yds this time, the longest I can get on my range at the moment.

I had to split the target sheet in half with the pics to keep enough detail.

Refined test with 4064, left half of the sheet:

100_1214.jpg


Right half:

100_1215.jpg


The 36.7gr load looks very good to me, I plan to do one more refinement, with 5 shot groups at 36.6, 36.7 and 36.8gr to see if there is any more to come. Even if I can't improve it, that is a 1/4MOA load (assuming it continues to perform the same as in this test) and I never imagined I would get close to that. Yotes and gophers, beware!:D

The initial test with 4895, left half of sheet (ignore the POI shift between #1, 2 and 3, I added a few clicks to get the groups centered better):

100_1216.jpg


Right half:

100_1217.jpg


I think I will have to redo the whole traverse in 0.2 increments and see if there is a node or two hiding in there, from what I can see with all the clocking of the groups, my initial 0.5gr increment looks too coarse and I may have missed the sweet spot in there somewhere. It does look like 35.0gr has serious promise, being very close to 1/4MOA at this point.

I have to say, I am extremely happy with the rifle, I never expected this kind of performance for the price. About the only thing I would improve is the stock, it is pretty flimsy and requires care in my technique to not muscle it into place and screw up the groups.

Any thoughts, experiences, comments on the testing and where I should go from here are welcome.

Mark
 
Last edited:
Your 2nd and 4th pictures are the same.

2nd-http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk107/mmattockx/100_1215.jpg
4th-http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk107/mmattockx/100_1215.jpg

Is this the proper one?
100_1217.jpg


I would retest those 35 and 35.5gr loads, .5gr should not open a group up from 1/2" to 4"

Shooting 5 or 10 round groups will give you a better idea of how the load is actually performing, fliers can land inside the group as well.
 
Work around the nodes and repeat to ensure consistency.

Very nice to have a factory rig at 1/4 min at 200yds.

Test as you will shoot it. If you are hunting coyotes, you will not need ( shouldn't need) 5 to 10rds to get the job done. As long as the cold bore and follow up go where you want, you are ready to hunt.

For this application, I would do multiple 3 or 4 rds groups to confirm my load.

If this is for competition, then you will have to increase the rd count to suit and the barrel may walk when it gets hot??????

Great start and enjoy...

Jerry
 
If this is for competition, then you will have to increase the rd count to suit and the barrel may walk when it gets hot??????

I shot the above groups by shooting 3 sets of 3 rounds, then taking a few minutes to let it cool down before the next strings. The barrel got warm, but never truly hot to the touch. So far, so good on the groups not opening up as the barrel heats up.

Mark
 
I would retest those 35 and 35.5gr loads, .5gr should not open a group up from 1/2" to 4"

Shooting 5 or 10 round groups will give you a better idea of how the load is actually performing, fliers can land inside the group as well.

I will redo from 34.4gr up to 35.8gr in 0.2gr increments and see what happens.

Once I get zeroed in on a node, I will do more testing with 5 round groups to confirm how it performs with bigger groups. At the moment, I am just trying to find the place to look more closely at.

Mark
 
Based on your previous post with the 100yd groups.

Looking at the 36.5gr 4064 group in this picture:
Clip.jpg


Vs the 36.7gr 4064 load in this picture:
Clip_2.jpg


It looks like 36.6gr should be right on the money between the two giving you .01gr either way for errors if those are repeatable groups.

I would test the 35-35.5 IMR4895 loads as well as these IMR4064 loads again if it were me.
 
Back
Top Bottom