Recoils less than an AK or SKS in 7.62x39
About the same as an AR in .223
Iron sights are nice and wide, good for low light without the "Nite-sites" luminescence.
Effective range, IMHO, about the same as the 7.62x39, maybe a tad less.
I'm not about to do torture testing on someone else's $3300 gun, so I can't comment on durability and reliability under adverse conditions.
As a historical collection piece, can't be beat. We had an original one many years ago. The "SS" Suréte got their hands on it, along with a PPSH.
Can't compare it to an AR.
Good close combat weapon with lots of collection appeal whereas the AR is a good range gun. IMHO, not that crazy about AR as combat gun. It's only advantages are light weight, sight and add-on options. AK has my vote for reliability and lethality. My ideal combat rifle for the average trooper would be AUG in short 6.5/7mm. supplemented in the squad by longer range MGs and "Marksman" optically sighted semi auto "almost" sniper rifles and, off course, actual snipers and their kit. Let's not forget FACs and artillery support, LAVs and tanks and good supply logistics.
Yes we have lots of experience with AK, AUG, L1a1, HK91 Sig 550, Sig 510, FN49, SKS etc........