Thanks for all the input so far guys! I guess I should have said what my plans are.....or atleast, try to half figure them out myself.
I have a friend with about 100 yards of property where we were planning to setup a VTAC board and some targets for some fun plink action. I know long range accuracy is not the forte of a untouched semi auto .22. That said, I am not married to the idea of a Ruger 10/22, especially if there is better out there for the money. My max budget on this is around $600...and yes, I have always kinda been the start with some basic and hot rod it to your liking, so that same appeal brought me to the Ruger 10/22. However, I am all ears for what may be a better choice. I have not looked into the T22, although I have spent a good amount of time looking into parts on the DLASK, Anarchy outdoors, and Spectre websites just to name a few.
As for a bolt gun, I do want one. But when I think bolt, I think a .308 or 6.5 Creedmoor centerfire....and I do plan on picking one up, but once I have a place to shoot some long distance.
Im gonna throw i different spin here.
GSG-16 if you want a FUN plinker.
Its tatticool and as accurate as most other semi's (no where near as accurate as a bolt)
the 10/22 only has 10rds in a mag, the GSG has 22rds and comes with 2 mags.
Put a cheap red dot on it and off you go.
It's worth being cautious with such claims without qualification. With the .22LR ammo available, no .22LR, semi or bolt, is able to "shoot very accurately" at 300 yards, let alone 400.
Regardless of rifle, the ammo itself cannot produce very accurate shooting at such long distances, unless the criteria is progressively loosened as distance increases. The performance of .22LR always gets worse and worse with distance.
A 10/22 is the perfect way to get into some fun shooting without spending to much. I bought one 45 years ago and it still serves me well.
Save yourself the hassle, skip Ruger and just buy a Dlask. Grey Birch also looks good but I don’t personally have experience with them.
Why start of with a low quality, overpriced inaccurate gun when you can get a quality Canadian made gun the first time?
Down side with GSG is the warranty is nearly slim to none, as people are having troubles getting theirs repaired
Where Ruger you really don't need to go thru warranty as there are parts galore.
I have a GSG, a 1022, a bolt 22 and another single shot 22, plus a 22 pistol. Long term I'd pick the 10/22.
10/22 is my choice and these can be made to shoot very accurately all the way out to 400yds.
Doesn't need to cost a ton.. although you can easily dump a bucket load of money into this platform.
Most of our current rifles started life as Carbines bought in end of season sales... so the upfront cost is very low too.
Being able to double tap a gong at distance is certainly one of this platforms many benefits over a bolt when competing in LR rimfire PRS.
Jerry
I'm sorry but this is a stupid comment. EVERY caliber gets worse with distance. Expectations are loosened as distance increases for EVERY caliber. Futhermore, "Very accurately" is a highly subjective term. For you to say that none of them can shoot "very accurately" at 400yds is nothing more than your opinion on what merits being called "very accurate".
Qualified enough me thinks.....
Qualified? A claim was made but no criteria for "very accurate" is offered. What qualifies as shooting very accurately out to 400 yards?
Don't apologize for thinking the comment is stupid; a lot of ill-informed people might think that way. The accuracy performance of .22LR as distance increaes is not a matter of opinion.
While it's correct to say that no "caliber" (to use your term) improves with distance, many centerfire rifle calibers don't suffer egregiously deteriorating performance out to 400 yards like the .22LR does. Unlike centerfire, which can often maintain a nearly similar level of accuracy between 100 and 200 yards (a linear or near linear increase), and even further (e.g. 1 MOA at 100 and 1 or nearly 1 MOA at 200), the .22LR round has no such ability. Of course, no round or caliber maintains the same level of performance at all distances, but the .22LR is a poor contender for shooting very accurately out to 300 or 400 yards.
The problem for .22LR is that its performance gets progressively worse as distance increases, much more than other target shooting "calibers" for which claims of "very accurate" performance might be made. As an illustration, on average, .22LR group sizes increase by a factor of about 2.8 between 50 yards and 100. That is to say, on average, a .5" ten shot group at 50 becomes a 1.4" ten shot group at 100 (.5" X 2.8 = 1.4"). Between 100 and 200 that would only get worse -- that is, more than a 2.8 factor. From 200 yards to 400 yards, it would be even more. In other words, .22LR performance (accuracy) deteriorates exponentially with distance.
This is why it's worth being cautious with claims without qualification of shooting very accurately out to 400 yards. With the .22LR ammo available, no .22LR, semi or bolt, is able to "shoot very accurately" at 300 yards, let alone 400. There are many "calibers" with which it is possible to shoot very accurately all the way to 400 yards, but .22LR is not one of them.
If someone wishes to describe .22LR as "shooting very accurately out to 400 yards" with qualification that's fine. To do so without, however, risks misleading readers or sounding ill-informed. The question is what qualifies as shooting very accurately at 400 yards?
Qualified? A claim was made but no criteria for "very accurate" is offered. What qualifies as shooting very accurately out to 400 yards?
You'd probably be well served with any of the more common 22LR autoloaders to start. Before buying any farkles, budget a couple hundred for a variety of ammunition so you can find something that groups well with your rifle. Your rimfire "ammunition library" is something that you will build as you go forward, useful with all future rifle purchases. Whether a new barrel, stock, or complete rifle, you'll probably find it changes what type of ammo groups well.
Personally, in your shoes I'd go with a basic 10/22 or Savage A22. Probably a package rifle with both irons and cheap optic. That way you have more context for deciding about upgrades to sights.
There's no substitute for experience, so just get something with a proven track record and get shooting. It's a pretty good bet that your choice of platform at this point is going to show its limitations as you gain experience, so don't waste time trying to get the perfect rifle right now. Just buy smart and you'll lose little (if anything) on resale.
I just would like to say, all of the replies are GREATLY appreciated! I wanted to quote more to ask specific questions, but not sure I can multiquote over various pages...
That said, this stuck out the most to me
I feel that this really sums me up best. I know this gun won't be a long range gun, and I guess I wasn't specific in my original post- I think of plinking as shorter range, fun, trying to hit targets, maybe using a VTAC board to spice it up, and over not a large distance- whether by definition thats what it is or not. Something I can shoot at my buddys property and have FUN while building skill. Not trying to sound like a hater, or that .22 is not a good caliber, or a childs gun, but I want this to be my learning gun- get good before hot rodding it, if I even do, and just have some fun. Eventually maybe move up to a bolt .22, or a larger center fire caliber in bolt or semi auto. But I want to build some chops.
Black Friday is coming up...I am going to see what is out there. I know one vendor near me is selling the 10/22 with a red dot for $400. I am not married to the Ruger idea, so I will check out the savages and the GSG mentioned again and see if there are any other deals out there. I am not opposed to spending money, but a good point was made about the guns holding their value, especially without mods, so maybe that's the way to go on my first gun. The Ruger's appeal was all the modification support out there, but I saw when pricing out a gun how easy it is to spend alot on the platform, and it made me rethink a super awesome gun off the start if I end up totally disliking it.
If I am not mistaken, I thought I also saw magazines for the 10/22 semi to hold 20 or 25 rounds? But maybe I am wrong on that. I appreciate the pointers! I am looking forward to my first purchase
Hey everyone,
Forgive me as the search function is not so great here....I am looking to make my first gun purchase a .22 caliber rifle. I have shot handguns, shotguns, and rifles before, but figure a .22 is a good place to start as someone who wants to get into shooting seriously with their own gun (Im also looking at acquiring a semi auto .556 rifle before they are outlawed, but more to have vs shoot right now). I had contemplated building something from complete scratch, as I am very mechanically inclined, but figured it might be best to start basic and build from there.
All things point to the Ruger 10/22 semi auto. I don't see myself leaving the gun "untouched" for long, and it seems the Ruger has a whole host of upgrades for it. In trying to decide with the various options, I am stuck between whether its worth spending for the "takedown" model with the barrel that can unthread, or just going with the basic, no stainless (does that really help or matter?) model that is about $350 everywhere you look. A bx25 trigger, stock of my choice, and maybe a scope or red dot later and I would probably be pretty happy. Or should I be looking at another .22 completely? Savage? GSG? I want something that will work well with maintenance and has options for customizing and growth.
I am open to input and insight....and I always love to hear the "if I were to do it again" stuff, as that's usually the best advice in my own experience lol