You need to get out more if you think IDPA is "just as bad"
60 plus pages of rules, really?
There shouldn't be any divisions, its a defensive shoot, as in run what you brung.
Changing sights moves you to a different division? Sights are sights, if you can't align 3 dots, you can't align straight 8's, Big dots, Trijicon HD's etc etc. It's a personal choice.
A defensive shoot doesn't afford you a walk through, neither should a shooting discipline designed to replicate it.
Advancing on targets is not defensive.
Penalties for dropping ammo, why? It only costs the competitor time to retrieve it.
No weapon mounted lights, why?
Two guys I know shot a match and were dq'd for "round dumping". Apparently engaging a target repeatedly to ensure you have sufficient hits to avoid penalty is a bad thing. I understand the premise behind why it may be deemed as "unsportsmanlike" but it is a game after all, and any advantage one can get the better. Round dumping would be eliminated if there weren't walk throughs which facilitate the "gaming" of a stage, just saying.
Lets not forget, this is a discipline designed around the defensive use of firearms, so why are we handicapping people from performing to their best by limiting gear and penalizing inconsequential actions? I say stack the deck and let the chips fall. If a competitor wants to dump a whole magazine into a target that's fine, when he fails to neutralize the next 4 or 5 targets due to ammo depletion then maybe he will learn to conserve ammo.
Just some points that rub me the wrong way. Its a game more than a discipline designed to aid those can carry or those who may need to use a firearm defensively.
TDC