Nea 102

fluidmax said:
Indeed...The status quo for NEA102 will stay unchanged until then.



It did for CZ858 and Swiss arm.
Click to expand...

It allowed for an oic to be written to deem those two rifles NR/R and ignore that the cz858 on the list were prohib as converted autos and that the swiss models were prohib as variants of the prohibited by name 550.

C42 didn't change the classification. Is set the framework for the government to write the OIC that did. The oic would need to be repealed. They don't need to touch c42 to do that.
 
fenceline said:
It allowed for an oic to be written to deem those two rifles NR/R and ignore that the cz858 on the list were prohib as converted autos and that the swiss models were prohib as variants of the prohibited by name 550.

C42 didn't change the classification. Is set the framework for the government to write the OIC that did. The oic would need to be repealed. They don't need to touch c42 to do that.
Click to expand...

I didn't directly but it provided the OIC the ability to override the classification ...Without C42 it would not have happened.
 
Here's what I don't understand, NEA likely has pretty deep pockets. They've been selling their Rifles worldwide for quite awhile so I'd expect them to be able to have a gaggle of Lawyers take the RCMP before the courts. It should be pretty easy to show the lab has been acting outside their mandate, or at the very least they are wasting tax money by not doing their job in a timely way deliberately. After all this should be straightforward, the AR-102 is not named prohib or restricted, it pre-dates the AR-15, Assuming it is going to use the AR-15 trigger group, it can't be easily converted to full auto.
 
redshooter said:
Here's what I don't understand, NEA likely has pretty deep pockets. They've been selling their Rifles worldwide for quite awhile so I'd expect them to be able to have a gaggle of Lawyers take the RCMP before the courts. It should be pretty easy to show the lab has been acting outside their mandate, or at the very least they are wasting tax money by not doing their job in a timely way deliberately. After all this should be straightforward, the AR-102 is not named prohib or restricted, it pre-dates the AR-15, Assuming it is going to use the AR-15 trigger group, it can't be easily converted to full auto.
Click to expand...
For the same reasons entire countries didn't want to piss off Bernie Ecclestone.
 
redshooter said:
Here's what I don't understand, NEA likely has pretty deep pockets. They've been selling their Rifles worldwide for quite awhile so I'd expect them to be able to have a gaggle of Lawyers take the RCMP before the courts. It should be pretty easy to show the lab has been acting outside their mandate, or at the very least they are wasting tax money by not doing their job in a timely way deliberately. After all this should be straightforward, the AR-102 is not named prohib or restricted, it pre-dates the AR-15, Assuming it is going to use the AR-15 trigger group, it can't be easily converted to full auto.
Click to expand...

1- they aint rich, i know they have investors they need to respond too
2- RCMP have lawyers that you pay for, who is gonna blink in court first do you think?
3- they dont have a mandate other than to class the firearms, no mandate on how fast they need to.
 
I wish there was more info about how the lab does business. Id be curious to know how many people are there and the volume of guns and paperwork they deal with. It's entirely possible they aren't trying to screw people around but how are we supposed to know that? I know the CFO office in Calgary only has 30% of the staff they should so when your PAL takes forever it's not because they aren't trying.
 
Maybe they can push an unreasonable delay thing like for prosecuting criminals. It clearly impacts their bottom line, not being able to manufacture and sell as much as they could. Make the RCMP decide withing 12 months or automatically non-res. :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom