I like the UI, but Solidoworks' file structure annoys the hell out of me. Mates seem less finicky in Inventor, too.
I've no experience in CAM (yet), but I hear good things about CATIA in that regard.
Stop it! You're making me hard!...

I like the UI, but Solidoworks' file structure annoys the hell out of me. Mates seem less finicky in Inventor, too.
I've no experience in CAM (yet), but I hear good things about CATIA in that regard.

I like the UI, but Solidoworks' file structure annoys the hell out of me. Mates seem less finicky in Inventor, too.
I've no experience in CAM (yet), but I hear good things about CATIA in that regard.
Reverse engineering a proven design isn't all that difficult or expensive. Just ask Norinco, they're masters at doing so. It's not like NEA has to come up with their own design from scratch. I honestly think NEA lacks the engineering talent required to do so in the first place. With all due respect, they're a machine shop, not weapons designers.
very true if you cant do that to a 50yr old design then you should give up and go be a plumber or somthing.
But more corectly china did not have to Reverse engineering the M16. the U.S. govement gave china the tec data and equipment to make m16,s to supply what we know know is the Taliban so that could fight the commies.
Those first gen CQ311 ar15s we has come in were left over from that war.
Im sure glad we helped supply and train the taliban.... Worked out well for us er.
Well we did do that with Iran,Iraq,Mexico, S America ect ect...
Are you sure about that? I don't see how that's remotely possible since it's almost a given that the Americans would have supplied weapons that were Com Bloc in origin as to mask their covert involvement as much as possible to the Soviets.
I don't see how that situation would have been a benefit to the Chinese by agitating the USSR by manufacturing and supplying the rifles on behalf of the Americans.
If you're correct, that's an interesting but oh history that I wasn't aware of.
The Chinese did not want the Russians in the middle east any more than we did.
I believe they were selling the guns to the Afghans and making decent money off the whole thing.
Anyways, this is getting waaay off topic.


The Afghans weren't buying them. They had no money. They were given the weapons. If it weren't for the insurgency the Americans wouldn't have involved themselves at all. They didn't want a direct confrontation with the Soviets over it.
Generally speaking, the Pakis ran the show on the ground and the Americans funded it. Most of the weapons were procured and distributed to the insurgency by the Pakistanis.
Anyways, this is getting waaay off topic.
NEA will have to strike a deal with Iran to one up the chinese/usa
But I will admit it is improbable that the guns the Afghans bought from the Chinese were built by NEA, and non-restricted.
They were already looking. We told them to pound salt.
Rifles shipping globally with no US involvement at all gets a lot of people coming out of the woodwork as you can imagine.
They were already looking. We told them to pound salt.
Rifles shipping globally with no US involvement at all gets a lot of people coming out of the woodwork as you can imagine.
yes 100% sure. just liek the fact that we the brits trained the Iraq national guard on how to interagate people, fly plans and ect.Are you sure about that? I don't see how that's remotely possible since it's almost a given that the Americans would have supplied weapons that were Com Bloc in origin as to mask their covert involvement as much as possible to the Soviets.
I don't see how that situation would have been a benefit to the Chinese by agitating the USSR by manufacturing and supplying the rifles on behalf of the Americans.
If you're correct, that's an interesting but oh history that I wasn't aware of.

Reverse engineering a proven design isn't all that difficult or expensive. Just ask Norinco, they're masters at doing so. It's not like NEA has to come up with their own design from scratch. I honestly think NEA lacks the engineering talent required to do so in the first place. With all due respect, they're a machine shop, not weapons designers.



























