if he,s smart he will stay out of it.I can't wait to hear Suputin's 2 cents....
If the price is around or below $2k and it is NR I would happily buy one.
Had nothing but excellent service from my 2 NEA 15's.
All animosity aside, I would love to be able to afford a Modern Hunter but I can't. I've even been into the ATRS shop to fondle it a couple of times and most recently I held the Modern Varminter. They are beautiful rigs but I CANNOT afford them. The MV, in its lowest cost configuration, is $3300. I'd have to empty my safe and divorce my wife to be able to own one.
If NEA comes out with a semi-auto 308 for $1500 I will be in the market for one in a heartbeat. I know it not the best but it is the best I can afford.
Same boat, love the MH, and MV but until I find that place in the US take will pay $35,000 for a testicle, NEA will be on my buy list if it passes.
I love this thread.
The rcmp recently alluded to the ar10 being not regulated like the ar15, when publishing their legal opinion on the akdal 1919 reclassification.
In short, they admit that the ar10, which predates the ar15, is not restricted by name like the ar15.
Nea has been pushing this angle apparently with the lab with this gun. Rumour has it they have a convincing arguement.
If the ar10 is recognized as any other rifle classification wise, why would any one by a proprietary rifle?
That rifle looks a lot like an ar10. If they copied anything, it would be that, not the MH. Especially given they have been designing this since before the MH became public knowledge.
Any idea what one of these would weigh?




























