That won't work with the high stock tube position.
If the adapter was height adjustable do you think it would be doable?
That won't work with the high stock tube position.
seeing as how your replacing the old sites, has anyone though about making some sort of custom front site base that doesn't have the old site but retains the bayo lug, and maybe even update it to use some new kind of bayonet. just a thought.
If the adapter was height adjustable do you think it would be doable?
We have a new front barrel clamp coming out that lets you move your front back up iron further forward. We are looking to launch a packge later in the year containing the front clamp, stock adapter and a set of Troy back up irons................... lets just say its going to be very affordable.
to be honest, we have no plans to make a height adjustable stock adapter. We are going to be bringing out a similar adapter that will house an ace style stock.
Can't we still keep the front sight if we want?
Anything that gives me a longer sight plane is welcome.
I'm not interested in looks, all I want is efficiency and a longer sighting plane with a rear peep sight is best for me.
That rear block makes me dream of a bolt-on (or clamp-on) integral drum peep unit mounted just at the right elevation for the actual front sight. This would probably shrink the groups we already get with the standard setup without any optical trickery.
Just good solid iron sights... and you still could have the option of a rear base, if you so design it.
Oh well, perhaps this sounds too much old-fashioned, doesn't it?
PP.
Not so old fashioned to me. In theory, it sounds right. What type of weight would be added by the barrel clamp/front BUIS?
I really don't know.
I'm talking about keeping the original front sight in its original location at the end of the barrel because this is the way to gain additional sighting plane with a well designed new rear-mounted peep.
I don't need a straight stock to reduce recoil of "the mighty 7,62x39 round", because doing so will force every "modern" sighting apparatus to sit a short furlong over the action-barrel plane and this is another no-no.
I don't want a denatured VZ-58 that looks, weighs and tastes like an AR, I don't need an AR.
I want no-nonsense innovative add-ons that improve the VZ's already fast handling and no bulky, weighty stuff that changes the rifle's neutral balance.
Is that too much to ask for?
PP.![]()
The more, the better.
PP.



























