Need Advise for Optic.... Short and mid range shooting.

Millet seem less expensive. But what is the overall quality?

I like the Vortex reticule... Interesting.

The low powered Millett is a decent optic.
If that is the Vortex I'm thinking of, the reticle is busy and gimmicky.
 
I would probably take a look at the Trijicon 1-4, myself.

Past 200 I think the reticle sucks...under 200, no problem.

For a cheaper option...maybe the Bushnell MTAC will be a good scope. I am starting to hear decent things about it from people I trust to evaluate optics accurately.

For slightly more...maybe the Nightforce?

200m is of course doable with a red dot but it depends what you want to happen at 200m...personally I would have a hard time hunting at that range with a red dot, for example, although part of that is just a target ID issue in low light. Still...that's part of shooting and a 1-4 would make life easier.

If you just want to bang plates at 200m, well, for that a red dot is definitely sufficient.

There's a lot of 1-4s coming to market now and I like that range for shooting short- to mid-distance. But the features and reticles vary a lot as well as the quality and you really need to think about what you are after.

Personally, I do not want target turrets, for example, and that limits the options some. I want a daylight-visible illuminated reticle, and that limits them again.

On the plus side, everybody with glass and aluminum pipe in stock makes a 1-4 now, so there are lots of choices.
 
I suggest you run irons until you can afford a quality optic.
I also use Elcan Spectre DR's on all my rifles now, but there is nothing wrong with Trijicon or Aimpoint.
 
Back
Top Bottom