I just completed the rather arduous task of loading 1000 45 ACP on my single stage RCBS Rock Chucker. I have decided I NEED a progressive, but which one? I have done some research and the unbiased reports conclude the Hornady is as good as the Dillon in almost every aspect and better in a lot of ways (talking LNL AP vs 650 XL). They also mentioned the cult that Dillon has assembled over the years and not to be swayed by that fact alone. The testing also included some Lee junk, but it fell short in almost every aspect except ease of priming. One I am trying to find more info on, but have yet to be successful is the upper end RCBS (can't remember model number)
Criteria;
I will not be loading rifle on it.
I want to load several handgun cartridges. 45 ACP, 10mm and possibly 38 spl/357, 45 LC.
If not at the beginning, I want to be able to add case and bullet feeders.
Cartridge change over ease is an issue (not a huge issue, but an issue)
Reliability is paramount, as is repeatability.
Speed is not critical, I don't need to make 1000 rounds an hour, but the 12 hour ordeal I just went through is pure BS !!!! I love loading but that was just not efficient use of my time, and at this juncture in my life I have more money than time.
So there is a question coming........of you gentlemen who use progressives, which do you use and why? Have you ever tried different ones? Please don't inundate me with Dillon cult phraseology, I've heard it before, let's just stick to technical qualities and why one feels one make excels over another. Hornady has a definite price edge and has glowing reports from what I have read so far, and seems to be significantly smoother to operate than the Dillon, due to a 2 part rotating device which works 1/2 on the up stroke and 1/2 on the down stroke as opposed to the full rotation being done on the up (or was it down) stroke.
So gentlemen please tell me what you use and WHY you chose it and like it. I have never owned a rotary progressive so I have no preconceived notions nor do I know anything about them, except what I have read this morning. I have an old C-H inline specifically for 38 spl WC loads, with 2.7 gns of Bullseye..........when it works it work well but it's like a DE Havilland Beaver, it need 2 hours maintenance for every hour of flying.......It was fine when I had a lot more life in front of me than behind and I didn't mind tinkering with it and figuring out how it all worked..........now I just want one that works at least 100 hours for 1 hour of maintenance or better.
Criteria;
I will not be loading rifle on it.
I want to load several handgun cartridges. 45 ACP, 10mm and possibly 38 spl/357, 45 LC.
If not at the beginning, I want to be able to add case and bullet feeders.
Cartridge change over ease is an issue (not a huge issue, but an issue)
Reliability is paramount, as is repeatability.
Speed is not critical, I don't need to make 1000 rounds an hour, but the 12 hour ordeal I just went through is pure BS !!!! I love loading but that was just not efficient use of my time, and at this juncture in my life I have more money than time.
So there is a question coming........of you gentlemen who use progressives, which do you use and why? Have you ever tried different ones? Please don't inundate me with Dillon cult phraseology, I've heard it before, let's just stick to technical qualities and why one feels one make excels over another. Hornady has a definite price edge and has glowing reports from what I have read so far, and seems to be significantly smoother to operate than the Dillon, due to a 2 part rotating device which works 1/2 on the up stroke and 1/2 on the down stroke as opposed to the full rotation being done on the up (or was it down) stroke.
So gentlemen please tell me what you use and WHY you chose it and like it. I have never owned a rotary progressive so I have no preconceived notions nor do I know anything about them, except what I have read this morning. I have an old C-H inline specifically for 38 spl WC loads, with 2.7 gns of Bullseye..........when it works it work well but it's like a DE Havilland Beaver, it need 2 hours maintenance for every hour of flying.......It was fine when I had a lot more life in front of me than behind and I didn't mind tinkering with it and figuring out how it all worked..........now I just want one that works at least 100 hours for 1 hour of maintenance or better.