Yup! The most ergonomic and practical way to open a break action IMO
Very nice. Would make a neat pheasant gun particularly in 16.
The action on the Darne is also pretty unique. Always discovering new things here.

Yup! The most ergonomic and practical way to open a break action IMO
Like these?
Like this.
BTW, gdawg, that top photo you posted is a lower grade MF Ideal and the bottom one is the highest grade they made....called an Ace of Spades. Depending on condition and gauge, an Ace of Spades would trade these days in the $25,000 CDN range. Mine is two grades below an Ace of Spades but was ordered with special wood and has a makers mark denoting that it was a special order and checked out by one of the directors of the company. The mechanics are the same in all of them.
If you notice, the figure in the wood on the Ace of Spades is clearly visible beneath the chequering. That's because it is around 36 LPI. Same as mine was originally. When I had the stock re-done, brought it down a few LPI so you actually get some grip out of it. But it's still in the 30 LPI range.
I also just noticed that Ace is an extractor model. It would be quite unusual for an Ace to be an extractor. Just about all I have seen before are ejector guns, as is mine.
Geez. No wonder that gets rave reviews. Hard to believe it is 2 grades below with that graining.
Esthetics of the 490 aside, once you shoot with a round action, whether it's an older Dickson or MacNaughton or a brand new David Mackay Brown all from Scotland, an MF Ideal or the Beretta 490 and 486, once you hunt with a round action, everything else just doesn't quite feel right.
I have heard that. What is it about the round action? Not much of a SxS guy, but have been trying to dip the toe into that water as I love upland.
Very nice. Would make a neat pheasant gun particularly in 16.
The action on the Darne is also pretty unique. Always discovering new things here.
![]()
Well, in an oversimplified way, our hands, when we grip something, form a rounded shape, not a square shape. We don't have hard right angles in our grip. So if you are holding onto something round, that fits your hand better than if you were holding onto something square. The problem for gunmakers is fitting the required internals that get the job done inside a rounded shape.
And when you hunt as North Americans do, what the English call rough hunting or walk up, you spend your day carrying the gun, typically with one hand around the action. Pick up a boxlock, pick up a sidelock and pick up a round action. Everyone would rather carry the round action.
They are not more popular because to a great degree, in SxS gun development in England at the end of the 19th century, the focus was on driven game, where the shooter is at a post, often with a loader (helper) and so the feel of the gun while carrying it over long distances wasn't a consideration. Other factors were, thus the ascendancy of the sidelock action to the pinnacle of SxS design according to conventional wisdom.
It is like minimalist steampunk.