Considering how much wood the average house uses each winter any trees that are already down will be rotten before your intended hunters get around to needing all that wood. Some of the trees I cut up for firewood would take a few big pickup loads per tree. IMO firewood just isn’t valuable enough to entice someone to go through the effort of driving deep into the bush multiple times for some firewood. You also need to consider that most locals in remote areas already have hunting land access meaning your hunters will likely be driving a considerable distance to get there thus making it pointless to bother with firewood.
I also think 6-8 cabins is way too many for that size land. Maybe 2-3 tops?
It sounds like you’re trying to make as much return as possible from your land which I totally understand. But I can’t think of anyone I hunt with who would bother driving anywhere north for 50-100 acres to hunt.
Lots of good posts here and yours is as well. Agreed that it would be a bad idea to separate hunters and give them only certain areas. Some would be better spots than others and that would cause friction.
My thoughts were to provide a high end bunkie at or near the hunt location. If a hunter is offered 50 acres of land for a private hunt with bunkie, then I can trade that for 2 weeks of work?
How far south of Bancroft. Is the property inside of the proposed Algonquin land claim area. If so you could run into issues trying to run a hunt camp.
My thoughts were to provide a high end bunkie at or near the hunt location. If a hunter is offered 50 acres of land for a private hunt with bunkie, then I can trade that for 2 weeks of work?
My thoughts were to provide a high end bunkie at or near the hunt location. If a hunter is offered 50 acres of land for a private hunt with bunkie, then I can trade that for 2 weeks of work?
I'm gonna burst some bubbles here, first of all 850 acres might seem like a big tract of land to someone that lives on 8000 sq ft but in actuality it can be totally covered in a few hours & hunted out by a single hunter in a couple days and be a worthless expenditure for the next two weeks hunter until the game moves around again to re-populate the area.
Maybe in the wide Alberta open prairie, Ontario woods, don't think so.
I'm gonna burst some bubbles here, first of all 850 acres might seem like a big tract of land to someone that lives on 8000 sq ft but in actuality it can be totally covered in a few hours & hunted out by a single hunter in a couple days and be a worthless expenditure for the next two weeks hunter until the game moves around again to re-populate the area.
*50 acres is *50 acres no matter where it is. An inexperienced walk & stalk hunter could alert
every animal in that tract of his presents in 4 hrs.
True i am in Ab where large tracks of open land hunting is available and on such land 850 acres is a 10 minute glassing sometimes but i hunted mostly in the central parkland where 850 acre tracts of bush are very common so I do know what can happen in them....and hunting that sized tract of land with a snow machine will alert every animal of something notright within 15 minutes let alone hours for a walker.
Ontario is a totally different ball game than Alberta.
You couldn’t be more wrong. It’s actually laughable that someone would even suggest such nonsense for the area the OP owns property. First off, there is zero possibility of booting around on a snowmobile or ATV to check those 850 acres. With the terrain and vegetation/trees it just won’t happen. Second, it would take a single person days upon days to cover those 850 acres on foot. I’m mainly into tracking or spot/stalk hunting and it would take me a week to thoroughly scout that much area in that area of Ontario.
Well, yeah it is... them bucks got twice the number of points too.![]()