stormbringer
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- S.W. Ontario
Quigley said:I think a few people owe Mark an apology![]()
And why would that be? He appears to agree with that POV.
Quigley said:I think a few people owe Mark an apology![]()
Skip said:The first card carrying IPSC shooter I ever saw was standing beside his freakin' overdone Chevy Suburban sporting a shiny nylon sports jacket with striped sleeves and and 6" high IPSC letters splashed all across his back. This was in a body shop (he was a customer). I got the same "aura" off him that I get every time the trap and skeet "boys" come off the line in their matching Beretta gun vests and yellow tinted shooting glasses with matching Gucci shell bags...
I'm much happier to shoot some IPDA with the regular folk. I'm getting way to old to strut. First it'd be IPSC, then a crappy Harley with weekend leathers...then therapy...
IPSC shooters seem to think they are aiming to please the upper class soccer mom crew, but its the factory worker who'll vote you off the island....
stormbringer said:And why would that be? He appears to agree with that POV.
Skip said:The first card carrying IPSC shooter I ever saw was standing beside his freakin' overdone Chevy Suburban sporting a shiny nylon sports jacket with striped sleeves and and 6" high IPSC letters splashed all across his back. This was in a body shop (he was a customer). I got the same "aura" off him that I get every time the trap and skeet "boys" come off the line in their matching Beretta gun vests and yellow tinted shooting glasses with matching Gucci shell bags...
I'm much happier to shoot some IPDA with the regular folk. I'm getting way to old to strut. First it'd be IPSC, then a crappy Harley with weekend leathers...then therapy...
IPSC shooters seem to think they are aiming to please the upper class soccer mom crew, but its the factory worker who'll vote you off the island....
Bartledan said:I shot the last BC qualifiers in knickerbockers, tights, while wearing a tilley hat. I looked like I was on some sort of ### excursion mixed with a fishing trip. You make take it as read that I did not "strut".
To clarify, IPSC is not looking for inclusion in the Olympics, just recognition by GAISF.Skip said:IPSC's probability in getting into the Olympics is low. There is a significant move to remove ALL shooting sports from the Olympics, not add more, and to get people to the Olympics means LOTS of resources for beginners to work on skills.
Skip said:My point was this: IPSC on some level is trying to represent itself as something its not. From the squabbles down east to the seemingly constant parade of attitudes that comes out of posts like these, it projects exclusivity, holier than thou, "you're not good enough for us" crap. Trap and skeet ranges do the same thing. I don't shoot IPSC, or trap - won't bother with it, for those reasons. I have shot with many who do. Individually they are great guys (most of them -some are the attitude personified).
The venue will determine the attractiveness of sport as much (or more) as the dress of the participants to non-shooters. Since the intent is apparently to attract the golf-links crowd, IPSC had better spend more time and loads of cash on the ranges. People are not going to go out in their "finery" if they are going to spend the afternoon running around in what appears to be a construction waste site. Golf courses are not laid out on stubble fields.
IPSC's probability in getting into the Olympics is low. There is a significant move to remove ALL shooting sports from the Olympics, not add more, and to get people to the Olympics means LOTS of resources for beginners to work on skills.
The greatest impediment to gun sports development is snobbery from within its ranks.
Here is a suggestion for both trap and IPSC orgs - have a LOT more "intro" days, geared for both shooters and non-shooters. IPSC oriented clubs should set up some well designed, well maintained permanent basic stages on their ranges that allow wannabees and newbies a chance to practice/try their hand, without having to go into a competition to see if it might be fun. Make me want to play - don't push me away with attitude. I read constantly about the bickering within IPSC here and I have to ask myself, with my limited shooting time and all the crap I fight over just trying to keep my guns, why would I bother ?
Quigley said:Well Skip...thank god we don't judge our prepective memebers as quickly and harshly as you seem to judge people...
Skip said:My point was this: IPSC on some level is trying to represent itself as something its not. From the squabbles down east to the seemingly constant parade of attitudes that comes out of posts like these, it projects exclusivity, holier than thou, "you're not good enough for us" crap. Trap and skeet ranges do the same thing. I don't shoot IPSC, or trap - won't bother with it, for those reasons. I have shot with many who do. Individually they are great guys (most of them -some are the attitude personified).
The venue will determine the attractiveness of sport as much (or more) as the dress of the participants to non-shooters. Since the intent is apparently to attract the golf-links crowd, IPSC had better spend more time and loads of cash on the ranges. People are not going to go out in their "finery" if they are going to spend the afternoon running around in what appears to be a construction waste site. Golf courses are not laid out on stubble fields.
IPSC's probability in getting into the Olympics is low. There is a significant move to remove ALL shooting sports from the Olympics, not add more, and to get people to the Olympics means LOTS of resources for beginners to work on skills.
The greatest impediment to gun sports development is snobbery from within its ranks.
Here is a suggestion for both trap and IPSC orgs - have a LOT more "intro" days, geared for both shooters and non-shooters.
IPSC oriented clubs should set up some well designed, well maintained permanent basic stages on their ranges
...that allow wannabees and newbies a chance to practice/try their hand, without having to go into a competition to see if it might be fun.
Make me want to play - don't push me away with attitude. I read constantly about the bickering within IPSC here and I have to ask myself, with my limited shooting time and all the crap I fight over just trying to keep my guns, why would I bother ?
Skip said:Thank you. Instead of dealing with my comments, you dismissed me outright, thereby proving my point.![]()
hungrybeagle said:I heard it was more like a "prance".
Skip said:Thank you. Instead of dealing with my comments, you dismissed me outright, thereby proving my point.![]()
Bartledan said:What Quigley doesn't know is that you are a really good s**t.
Here is a suggestion for both trap and IPSC orgs - have a LOT more "intro" days, geared for both shooters and non-shooters.
These are called "club matches", and they are about once a month at most clubs. How do you let the non-shooters know they exist? Only people who are alerady into IPSc toruble to keep track of when matches are.
Skip said:"club" is correct. Club matches have very little to do with attracting new members or opening the sport to non-shooters. For lessons about that, talk to Stormbringer. Dressage? Please... maybe the comparison is not too far fetched.
Rightly or wrongly, IPSC is/has built a reputation up for itself as an anal, snobbish pursuit for people with big egos and big wallets. Just read the IPSC threads on the first page of this forum. Wah, wah, wah all through the threads.
I don't doubt for a minute that when you guys, particularly Nutz, get together for a shoot you have a good time, but you sure do spend a lot of time, too much time, bickering. So where's the attraction? Its like going to dinner with a couple of friends who are about to divorce, but can't figure out what to do with the assets.
IPSC needs to fix its house. It needs to figure out what it exists for and for who. My home club has had maybe one IPSC event in 5 years - this is a club of 500 members, of which 1-200 "support" the handgun range (20 showed up for the annual meeting in which events and range development are discussed. The word IPSC never came up. There was a lot of discussion about SASS and CA events on on the books (this is Ontario don't forget), in addition to the regular fun shoots held every summer), even though we have stands lying around all over with "IPSC" marked on them.
I am IPDA/CDPA certifed - took the second CSSA CDPA course offered. IPDA is gaining ground because its all the things IPSC is not.
My point is this: you guys are caroming off one another over the minutiae of rules, and dress, so as to be politically correct, but you're not addressing the issues that will keep people away from the sport. They're not lining up for "dressage" either. I re-iterate what I said earlier: IPSC needs to fix its house. It needs to figure out what it exists for and for who.
Quigley, you continue to demonstrate my point...![]()
![]()
Bartledan said:Well, I tried.
Skip, you haven't given IPSC a fair shake, and instead of considering my ponts, you've become defensive. You, my friend, are an Anti, every bit as bad as Windy and her crew.
Skip said:"club" is correct. Club matches have very little to do with attracting new members or opening the sport to non-shooters. For lessons about that, talk to Stormbringer. Dressage? Please... maybe the comparison is not too far fetched.
Rightly or wrongly, IPSC is/has built a reputation up for itself as an anal, snobbish pursuit for people with big egos and big wallets. Just read the IPSC threads on the first page of this forum. Wah, wah, wah all through the threads.
I don't doubt for a minute that when you guys, particularly Nutz, get together for a shoot you have a good time, but you sure do spend a lot of time, too much time, bickering. So where's the attraction? Its like going to dinner with a couple of friends who are about to divorce, but can't figure out what to do with the assets.
IPSC needs to fix its house. It needs to figure out what it exists for and for who. My home club has had maybe one IPSC event in 5 years - this is a club of 500 members, of which 1-200 "support" the handgun range (20 showed up for the annual meeting in which events and range development are discussed. The word IPSC never came up. There was a lot of discussion about SASS and CA events on on the books (this is Ontario don't forget), in addition to the regular fun shoots held every summer), even though we have stands lying around all over with "IPSC" marked on them.
I am IPDA/CDPA certifed - took the second CSSA CDPA course offered. IPDA is gaining ground because its all the things IPSC is not.
My point is this: you guys are caroming off one another over the minutiae of rules, and dress, so as to be politically correct, but you're not addressing the issues that will keep people away from the sport. They're not lining up for "dressage" either. I re-iterate what I said earlier: IPSC needs to fix its house. It needs to figure out what it exists for and for who.
Quigley, you continue to demonstrate my point...![]()
![]()