So a guy asks for advice about a rifle. I have owned said rifle , found it to be lacking in all areas for the price , recommend him not buy that rifle and save for a better one, question the validity of advice given here from some others who appear to have little to no actual experience with said rifle. All to help him not go through the expense I did and I’m the “dog with a bone”?
This is the exact problem with this forum. It’s full of blowhards giving advice based on zero or very limited actual experience.
This is a persons money they are spending , if you don’t have relevant experience and actual knowledge of the rifles asked about then don’t influence the guy one way or another.
Personally I know how it sucks to buy something , be dissatisfied then have to go through the bull$hit of getting what you actually should have got in the first place.
So someone with experience in the exact question topic offers advice he is considered a “dog with a bone”. How many people have wasted their hard earned through poor advice in this forum ?
I’ll just shut up then and let the internet benchrest experts help this guy waste his money on a piece of $hit rifle that will no doubt let him down at the worst possible time.
Good luck OP , with advice like this forum gives you , you just can’t go wrong lololololol
One last thing , the reason I’m pushing on the Sauer is that it is pretty much the only new rifle you can get in 9.3x62 that is readily available and relatively in the same price range as the zastava. Anyway good luck with your decision, if you do go with a zastava I hope you get a good one. All the best and peace out.