Again, show me where I said anybody has the right to access private property. More BS by you.
It is not me running to government to change the law.
New SK trespassing laws coming soon
- Thread starter scott_r
- Start date
- Status
Again, show me where I said anybody has the right to access private property. More BS by you.
It is not me running to government to change the law.
So you will allow access as long as you get your respect first, because that is the only thing this is all about.
Farmers wanting new laws based on hurt feelings.
I have group of guys shooting geese on a quarter of mine this morning without permission.
OMG the disrespect!! I may have to lie down.
You claiming that you will be criminalized if you have to ask permission to use someone else's land is you calming you have a right to it.
Shawn
The first thing you have posted that is not retarded. You are right it is about respect, either you respect that someone else owns it or you don't and think you can use it as you see fit without owning it.
Shawn
I said this from the start.
It's not about damage, poaching, not allowing hunting, invasive species.
It's about little men wanting "respect"
If I was claiming you have no right to refuse access, that would be me claiming I have a right to access.
Nowhere have I made that claim.
That is specifically what you are calming.
Demanding that a property owner has to specifically notify you that the land he paid for and owns is private and not yours to use as you see fit by law. Is exactly that. Que BS about a handgun ban or that me not locking my truck mean you can use it LOL
Shawn
Were you savaged by a farmer at some point in your life? You’ve made it abundantly clear after 28 pages that you hate farmers, have issues with authority and respecting property, and generally dislike change.
I’ll say it again for the final time and then I’m done.
As much as you want to stick your fingers in yer ears and throw a hissy fit over it, this is 100% about damage, invasive species and having full control over who accesses my property.
It’s not “the land”, it’s my land. Thankfully the days of your NDP socialist ideas are coming to an end in this province, I hope you can learn to cope with it.
Have a nice day!
I am a farmer. 13 quarters of great hunting land.
You have full control of your land now, just as I do. Difference is I'm not too lazy to post the land if I choose to.
I am not demanding anything of the sort. More BS.
I am simply stating that as a landowner I'm fine with the way the law is now.
Well except for the times when you claimed hunters were being criminalized and it was the same thing as a handgun ban, or that if I didn't lock my house, car or shop it was cool to use them LOL
Shawn
Hunters who cause no damage the way they legally hunt now will now be criminals for doing what they did before.
Same logic banning handguns will stop damage being done with handguns.
Never said it was OK to use your house, car or shop. More BS.
You take action to prevent use of your car, house and shop but don't want to take action to prevent use of your land.
Only if they don't want to take action to prevent breaking the law. But that is too hard for hunters but should be mandatory for all land owners, who BTW far far out number hunters, who spent years and hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars and untold hours to make that money to buy the property you want to use for free.
Shawn
Or inherited from dad who was probably made of stronger stuff.
If you can’t be bothered to ask to access, why do you think you should be allowed on? I would be pizzed if you put up a tent in my back yard in town. Close to 90% of the people we ask say yes, those that say no have no obligation to say any more. We think it is common respect.
The only constant is change, and I believe it is coming. The current trespass law is too hard to enforce. It seems to me that you have to catch a guy behind your signs, tell him to leave and then charge him if he comes back. There are enough scumbags out there causing real problems for people that the frustration is near a boiling point for some I'm sure. It does sadden me though that there are people so fragile yet narcissistic that they feel victimized by the fact that someone may have shot a coyote on their land at some point in the past.
This is my last post on this thread so I'll share a short wish list:
- No vehicles allowed off road for any reason without permission.
- Some funding to SERM for some sting operations in all regions of Sask to prosecute the benefactors of paid hunting. This activity is already common in areas where demand for access exceeds the supply for game, ie regular elk in the forest fringe. My hunch is that organizations like SARM see the hunting "industry" and want their pound of flesh.
- The courts to take offenders seriously and make fines reflect the amount of public dollars it takes to convict.
- I'd like to be a fly on the wall when someone like Shawn has to explain to his teary eyed little girl why it's OK to leave that crippled goose across the fenceline to suffer.
I believe in the rule of law and am not quite a libertarian, but I don't trust that government will always get it right, hence my fear of change.
A final though on property rights. Every school in our district, BEFORE the national anthem are recited words to the effect that "We are treaty people. We are on treaty six land, home of the Cree and Metis". FACT.
This is my last post on this thread so I'll share a short wish list:
- No vehicles allowed off road for any reason without permission.
- Some funding to SERM for some sting operations in all regions of Sask to prosecute the benefactors of paid hunting. This activity is already common in areas where demand for access exceeds the supply for game, ie regular elk in the forest fringe. My hunch is that organizations like SARM see the hunting "industry" and want their pound of flesh.
- The courts to take offenders seriously and make fines reflect the amount of public dollars it takes to convict.
- I'd like to be a fly on the wall when someone like Shawn has to explain to his teary eyed little girl why it's OK to leave that crippled goose across the fenceline to suffer.
I believe in the rule of law and am not quite a libertarian, but I don't trust that government will always get it right, hence my fear of change.
A final though on property rights. Every school in our district, BEFORE the national anthem are recited words to the effect that "We are treaty people. We are on treaty six land, home of the Cree and Metis". FACT.
Last edited:
LOL go ahead and post up were I said that
The simple fact that you have to make up BS to try and support your BS positions does nothing but prove you are talking out your ass
Shawn
What he said is true. Under the new law a crippled goose that lands in a field you don't have permission to access must be left for fear of being charged with trespassing if you try to retrieve it.
- Status
