The reaction in the forums was almost the same when Magpul announced the AFG. Since the rule of cool seems to drive so much of the tactical aftermarket, I pay attention whenever someone puts out a product that looks a bit goofy. Usually, that means they focused on function, and the product is a solution to a problem (even one most shooters don't realize exists)
It may not be suited to every shooting position and hold style, but I'm guessing it does the job
I disagree, the AFG was an expansive idea on an already useful piece of equipment. The point here is that the Tavor was never intended to be used with a bipod and if someone wants a good bench shooting rifle, a Tavor is not the best choice. It's like training a sprinter for a marathon, doesn't make sense....




















































