New to the site

fralic76

Regular
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Hi everyone,
I'm new to the site just wanted to know if there are anyone else who has a cooey 39, winchester 69A or a sears model 8C? These are the 22's that I have and is thinking about buying 1 of 3 guns:
1. Savage Mark II FV
2. Stevens Model 300
3. Marlin Model 981T
What you recommend?
 
had a Cooey 39....gave it to a youngster....had many Cooey 64s which includes the sears 8C...still have a first model Cooey 64 c/w plastic mag...looking for another mag.

Of the 3...I have possession of the Stevens 300.....countless shells thru it and still shoots like new even though about 5 years old. I do like the bull barrels also as I shoot gophers out to 200 yards with my Mossy 144 lsb. And as a backup lighter gun, I use a Marlin 81 made in 1940. So it depends on if you have to carry or can stay stationary.
 
1. Savage Mark II FV
2. Stevens Model 300
3. Marlin Model 981T
What you recommend?

Your Cooey is a single shot, the Win 69A is a beautiful classic bolt (i hope yours has the peep sight) and the Sears is a semi-auto. Good selection, IMO.

For all out accuracy among the three choices, I'd take the MKIIFV. My MKIIF does 1.5 inch 100 meter 5-shot groups with bulk Winchester Dynapoints. The MKIIFV should do a bit better, at the sacrifice of a little more weight.

My 981T groups similar to my MKIIF and is my choice for a tube-mag bolt rifle. I like the overall feel, fit and finish of the Marlin best.

I haven't shot a Model 300 but it is a Savage without the Accutrigger It is the cheaper version of the MKIIF. With a trigger job, it could group like the MKIIF.

IMO, any of the 3 choices would be a good choice depending on what you will use them for as well as your budget. But I would pick the Marlin 981T because you do not have a tube-mag 22 yet. I like shooting my 981T because I find it takes less time to reload 17 rounds via tube than via box magazine. I also like the idea of not having to buy extra magazines in case the original gets lost. Magazines tend to get separated from the firearm and they get misplaced.
 
Last edited:
I have a model 69. I have done quite a bit of what they now call Bubba work, on it. I have shot a fair bit of three position competetive shooting with it in the past. For the off hand poition, I like the method of the fingers extended on my left hand, with the forestock resting on the finger tips, while my elbow rests on my hip. It takes just a bit of body bend to make this work, but it is the ideal, and more or less standard way, of competetive off hand shooting. Thus, I checkered the bottom of the stock, where my finger tips went.
A peep sight should be as close to the eye, with a 22, as one can get it. So, I extended my Lyman aperature on a Weaver base mount, bolted to the left side of the receiver. I have the Lyman variable size aperature disc to screw into a peep sight. The outside of the ring is about 1ÂĽ inches across and made of rubber. For off hand, or standing shooting position, I rest my eye brow right on this rubber ring. This makes for the steadiest off hand position one can get.
In competetive three, or four position shooting, the rifle is always held by hand, without artificial rests. Therefore, the best grouping of rifles is not the critical factor, as long as the rifle is well bedded and shoots good. Balance of the rifle and trigger pull is more important. In the years when small bore sporting rifle was very popular, a Winchester 69 was often used, even by very good shooters. The 69 is the third rifle down from the top in the Winchester line. First is the 52, then the 75.
At gun shows now, a good 69, with good aperature sights, front and rear, will run around $250-$275. Compared to new rifles, I think that is a real bargain.
 
Just to add some more here, while we are on the 22 Winchester subject. There are a few heavier model 75 match rifles around. They made a 75 sporter, but I have never seen one.
Most north american serious match shooters used the heavy Model 52 Winchesters. The weight limit for sporting rifle shooting ruled out the heavy rifles. The Model 52 sporters were always scarce and expensive. They had an oustanding trigger release, a very short hammer fall and the very best of workmanship in them.
But here is a funny thing. I have shot two different Model 52 Winchester sporting rifles with the best of aperature sights, in small bore sporting rifle competition, three position shooting. I could not make a bit better score with them, than I could with my third down the line, Moeld 69! As I said before, balance of the rifle is very important. For me, the 52 sporters had too much taper on the barrels, making the front end too light for best balance, for me.
 
Hi everyone,
I'm new to the site just wanted to know if there are anyone else who has a cooey 39, winchester 69A or a sears model 8C?

No, you are the only one ... LOL

The savage accutrigger is fantastic on that little Mark II and they are quite accurate with or without the heavy barrel.

The Stevens feels wonderful in the hands and is very light and accurate as well, but the trigger is not as good out of the box.

Both the savage and Stevens are known to occasionally have a feeding minor issue from the magazine, but it is easily remedied by swearing quietly and tapping the mag a little, then re-working the bolt handle.

No info on the Marlin as I have not owned or used one, but I did have 2 model 80s and a model 81, and a model 39TDS. They were all decent guns.
 
981T holds 17 rounds .22 LR in the tube. Have not tried Shorts and Longs. I only shoot the cheapest bulk ammo and very happy with accuracy and operational reliability (100%). Rare ammo related misfires to be expected from Winchester bulk Dynapoints.

Trigger of the Marlin is not as good as on the MKII Savages (Accutrigger), but then the Accutrigger is probably the best trigger in its price class.

Go to the Marlin sub-forum on RimfireCentral.com (cheap trigger job DIY, etc)
Lots of info on Marlins and Savages (on the Savage subforum)
 
The Marlin 81 I have holds 15 LR in the tube. I prefer the tube type mags as they hold so many and never get lost and are much easier to reload.

Was it the Cooey 64 that you had the ejector replaced? the part is only about $5 and very easy to install. takes about 10 minutes. The model 39 is much more difficult.
 
thinking about buying 1 of 3 guns:
1. Savage Mark II FV
2. Stevens Model 300
3. Marlin Model 981T
What you recommend?

of those three I only have Savage MkII FV, had it for a few years now. It gets my vote - very accurate rifle with pleasant trigger.
 
Marlin 981T or 981TS, says "All Marlin bolt action rimfire rifles feature the new T-900 Fire Control System". What is that like?

All I can say is that the Savage Accutrigger is crisper and lighter. I can't find my trigger pull gauge but the trigger on one of my 981T's is at least a pound higher and on the other 981T it is about 1.5 pounds higher. The 981's got better with more firings. I don't think they will ever become as light as the Accu, though.

Having said that, after a little practice, I can get the same groups at 100 meters with the 981 as with the MKIIF.

The Accu is better for the range in its lighter settings. IMO, 981T is ok both at the range and in the field.
 
Back
Top Bottom