NEW: Troy 102 Non Restricted Semi Auto Rifle, PRESALE NOW LIVE!

jiffx2781 said:
Is it possible you can post the FRT in pdf format so we can download a copy? (and actually read what it says). The picture posted is rather blury.
Click to expand...

I'll have to upload it some place tomorrow as I don't think I can upload a pdf to here.

Ryan
 
How is there no pictures or more specs on this rifle? Not a good way to drum up excitement. If the rifles were already paid for and the preorder was not needed, then why not wait until the rifle was closer to being released?
 
So if Troy purchased the plans from NEA, and the FRT says the NEA is the manufacturer, and the notes say the rifle is manufactured by NEA and BRANDED as a Troy, does that mean the NEA plans haven’t been modified at all? Same specs and tolerances? Just Troy stock and other parts bolted on to the NEA receiver set, which is suppose to be made by Troy, in the USA... while the FRT says Canada...
 
I must say I’m not super impressed. Paid full pre sale for a Troy and now FRT says NEA?? I just sold my BCL 102 for a NEA 102?
I know Troy makes great products but I’m still a little weary and was misled.
 
I thought NEA was out of the firearms game after "Black Creek Labs has recently made significant strategic and operational changes in order to move into a new era of developing and manufacturing quality products for the global defence industry and the individual Canadian consumer.

One of the boldest moves that Black Creek has recently made is the decision to demerge North Eastern Arms Group."

http://soldiersystems.net/2019/04/01/strategic-and-operational-changes-at-black-creek/

:rolleyes:
 
Chemist said:
We'll be posting the FRT sheet for the Troy 102 shortly. The FRT changed slightly from what we were originally told...don't worry it is still 100% made by Troy Defense in the US and non restricted. What you will see on the FRT is that it says Make: Troy Defense, Model Troy 102 BUT the manufacturer now shows North Eastern Arms. NEA is not making this rifle, it is a Troy made rifle. It shows NEA as the manufacturer as it turns out they sold Troy the data package. I know some people dislike NEA but don't be concerned, this is not an NEA firearm in any way except they provided Troy with the file to make the receiver set.

Ryan
Click to expand...

Strange that the FRT would say manufactured in Canada. The FRT is wrong?
 
jza said:
Strange that the FRT would say manufactured in Canada. The FRT is wrong?
Click to expand...

Guys,

I'll chime in here as I worked with SFRC and Troy on this;

The only part of a firearm the RCMP care about is the receiver. For the AR10, it is the lower.

To get this project to market and avoid the 12+ month wait for a unique FRT, the IP for a 102 approved lower was licensed from NEA to Troy in the USA.

Because NEA is the original manufacturer on record with the RCMP, it will also be the manufacturer. Which is separate from where it is manufactured.

The Troy 102 is not a branded NEA. It is a newly made, Troy manufactured rifle that simply uses the NEA approved TDP which has been approved by the RCMP. The changes troy made to the receiver were submitted to the RCMP and deemed to be within acceptable tolerances to the original and therefore, we could move things forward.

If anyone wants further info, please feel free to PM me, but neither SFRC or TSE are misleading anyone here.

JR
 
TSE JR said:
Guys,

I'll chime in here as I worked with SFRC and Troy on this;

The only part of a firearm the RCMP care about is the receiver. For the AR10, it is the lower.

To get this project to market and avoid the 12+ month wait for a unique FRT, the IP for a 102 approved lower was licensed from NEA to Troy in the USA.

Because NEA is the original manufacturer on record with the RCMP, it will also be the manufacturer. Which is separate from where it is manufactured.

The Troy 102 is not a branded NEA. It is a newly made, Troy manufactured rifle that simply uses the NEA approved TDP which has been approved by the RCMP. The changes troy made to the receiver were submitted to the RCMP and deemed to be within acceptable tolerances to the original and therefore, we could move things forward.

If anyone wants further info, please feel free to PM me, but neither SFRC or TSE are misleading anyone here.

JR
Click to expand...

Hey JR, thank you very much for the informative update, it is very helpful.

With NEA licencing Troy to use their IP for the AR10 lower, would you know what NEA has planned for their AR10 platform?
Licencing a competitor could be seen as a change in NEA's direction for the manufacturing of AR10s within Canada.
Just curious.

Rick
 
King0265 said:
I must say I’m not super impressed. Paid full pre sale for a Troy and now FRT says NEA?? I just sold my BCL 102 for a NEA 102?
I know Troy makes great products but I’m still a little weary and was misled.
Click to expand...

It is a Troy, made by Troy in the US. NEA owns the design for the NEA102 style lower so FRT's will always show that. It's not an NEA made gun...NEA doesn't make anything anymore...they just license out their lower style to people.

Ryan
 
NEA does not physically manufacture anything anymore. Since they split with BCL they are mainly doing product design, consulting etc and licensing products they design.

Ryan

RAConnol said:
Hey JR, thank you very much for the informative update, it is very helpful.

With NEA licencing Troy to use their IP for the AR10 lower, would you know what NEA has planned for their AR10 platform?
Licencing a competitor could be seen as a change in NEA's direction for the manufacturing of AR10s within Canada.
Just curious.

Rick
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom