It is useful for CF Personnel to take the course before challenging their PAL test. The major reason being, there are some idiosyncrasies and redundancies in weapons handling that both sides do not necessairily have in common.
I would have gotten quite a few questions wrong had I relied only on my military training. And I'm sure many others would also.
For instance, on my PAL course we were taught to use a bore light or stick your finger in the action to ensure the action did not close, as you inspected your bore from the buisness end. This was part of the "ACTS & PROVE" apparently.
I have never seen a military member perform this type of "safety check", and it is not part of our TOET's. The only exception is if you're doing a field strip, detailed strip, or preparing to go on the firing line. And even then, folks generally just pull out the bolt carrier to look down the bore. No sticking "le muzzle" in "le face"
As for Mil members being allowed to own prohib after their service, based solely on the premise that they have handled them through the course of their duty, its not gonna happen. (It would be nice though!)
I would have gotten quite a few questions wrong had I relied only on my military training. And I'm sure many others would also.
For instance, on my PAL course we were taught to use a bore light or stick your finger in the action to ensure the action did not close, as you inspected your bore from the buisness end. This was part of the "ACTS & PROVE" apparently.
I have never seen a military member perform this type of "safety check", and it is not part of our TOET's. The only exception is if you're doing a field strip, detailed strip, or preparing to go on the firing line. And even then, folks generally just pull out the bolt carrier to look down the bore. No sticking "le muzzle" in "le face"
As for Mil members being allowed to own prohib after their service, based solely on the premise that they have handled them through the course of their duty, its not gonna happen. (It would be nice though!)