The show was put on hold, but then they did allow it to happen with the condition of no handguns and no ammo.
You are right, it has a lot to do with perception of the masses; Specially when Surrey has been having a lot of shooting incidents lately.
I would boycott it by not attending! It is one of the biggest reasons I go....
Amen to that brother!Except that only furthers their agenda. You boycott it, not enough people attend, and they can say well nobody went so clearly its not wanted, lets not allow any more shows in the future.
The best thing you can do is go, then write to Surrey city council about how you were disappointed by the lack of sporting arms and ammo.
ItsSeems to me it is more of a political maneuver (manure) by the mayor of Surrey......
alright and a big steaming pile of it. Some have said to boycott the show but that only hurts the organizers and vendors. Also plays into the hands of the people that want to see the show not return at all next year.Good for you. There was two or three published letters from the day before.Put my .02 in the form of a letter to the editor of the Province. Published today.
Except that only furthers their agenda. You boycott it, not enough people attend, and they can say well nobody went so clearly its not wanted, lets not allow any more shows in the future.
The best thing you can do is go, then write to Surrey city council about how you were disappointed by the lack of sporting arms and ammo.
Put my .02 in the form of a letter to the editor of the Province. Published today.
It would be nice to think all the 'free' publicity would translate into increased traffic.Here is an intriguing thought...
I was at the show earlier today. It opened at noon.
I was actually surprised how busy it was during normal working hours.
I have to wonder if all the extra publicity brought in more traffic.



























