I just added 223 to my reloading regimen, the only way that I could get screwed later on is a shortage of bullets.
$1800 gets you a set of dies to reform spent .22lr into .55grain .223 pills .. Filling with solder wire is also required ..
Very sad that .223 pills are so costly .. Compared to other calibers ..
Interesting. Please share the details.
Always lots of spent, useless .22 around.
$1800 gets you a set of dies to reform spent .22lr into .55grain .223 pills .. Filling with solder wire is also required ..
Very sad that .223 pills are so costly .. Compared to other calibers ..
Are we talking about just Norinco AMMO here, or are we talking about Norinco FIREARMS as well?
You should be worried more about access to the guns that use the ammo than the ammo. If everyone sent the value of one case of ammo to the orgs who work to protect these guns, we would have less of an issue.
Looks that way, can someone confirm?
So the company that ships Norinco will ship guns across the ocean still, but not ammo? Seems pretty stupid to me.
uhhhhhh ammo that can go boom and is a dangerous explosive product vs Guns that are chunks of steel and pose no hazard.
Who's stupid here?
Me either. The case that I bought some years ago reeked when it was shot. I ran a bunch through a Mini-14 I owned at the time. Not only did the rifle shoot like crap with Norinco it smelled like it too.Never liked that ammo anyways..
Too many bullets get "pushed in" during cycling, creating potential over pressure situation.
I have seen that ammo breaking AR bolts, no thanks.
uhhhhhh ammo that can go boom and is a dangerous explosive product vs Guns that are chunks of steel and pose no hazard.
Who's stupid here?
Was there not a test done by SAAMI or something where they tried to blow up ammo like the supposed "bomb" people try to propagate it can become, and found it simply fizzles? Ammo is not an "explosive" in that it will not create a bomb effect when ignited en-mass.
There's also no need to be insulting.