non restricted 10/22 pistol

jbunny

Regular
Rating - 100%
99   0   0
Location
centeral BC
here is a pic of my non reastricted 10/22 pistol defender.
will get a laser sight on it one of these
100_0155.jpg
s days
100_0154.jpg
 
it's a untouched standard ruger 10/22 overall lenght
is 28.25 inches. that 2 1/4 inches over the min of 26 inches. no differant than putting a pistol grip on
a mossberg 500 shotgun, is there???????????
 
the scope is a tasco 1.5 power pistol scope. the 25 meter
and 50 meter gongs at the pistol range, 10 out of 10
rapid fire 2 hand hold. i
1 screw and 1 1/1 minutes to change back to rifle
Laser man
 
jbunny said:
... no differant than putting a pistol grip on
a mossberg 500 shotgun, is there???????????
No difference really ... but then that Mossberg is also a restricted weapon under Canadian Law, if it can be aimed and fired with one hand!

1. Under Canadian Law, all "handguns" are "Restricted" (unless they are "Prohibited".)

2. The legal definition of "handgun" is found in Section 84 of the Criminal Code of Canada:
“handgun” means a firearm that is designed, altered or intended to be aimed and fired by the action of one hand, whether or not it has been redesigned or subsequently altered to be aimed and fired by the action of both hands.
Under these provisions, if you can aim and fire it with one hand, you have created a "handgun" - and thus a "Restricted Weapon" - when you fit the barreled action to this stock ... (What's worse - under the latter part of the above Criminal Code provision, having done so, your 10/22 legally remains a handgun, and thus Resticted, even when you change it back to rifle configuration! :eek: )
 
You can aim and fire anything with one hand....that don't make it a handgun......your reading too much into the regs.....

GrantR said:
No difference really ... but then that Mossberg is also a restricted weapon under Canadian Law, if it can be aimed and fired with one hand!

1. Under Canadian Law, all "handguns" are "Restricted" (unless they are "Prohibited".)

2. The legal definition of "handgun" is found in Section 84 of the Criminal Code of Canada: Under these provisions, if you can aim and fire it with one hand, you have created a "handgun" - and thus a "Restricted Weapon" - when you fit the barreled action to this stock ... (What's worse - under the latter part of the above Criminal Code provision, having done so, your 10/22 legally remains a handgun, and thus Resticted, even when you change it back to rifle configuration! :eek: )
 
coltfan said:
You can aim and fire anything with one hand....that don't make it a handgun......your reading too much into the regs.....
Don't be too confident - what you say is arguably true, but ... this stock goes further, and alters a rifle configuration to a pistol grip without buttstock! (You'd be well advised to research some of the case law on this ... Perhaps I should mention that I am a lawyer.)
 
it's a grey area. It seems apparent that the Ruger was designed to be fired by 2 hands . Same asa pistol grip replacing the stock on a shotgun, sure you can fire it 1 handed, but unless you're built like Arnie in his heyday your chance of aiming accurately and hitting your target are slim.

it depends on the definition of fire. To me it has to mean aim and fire with a reasonable probability of hitting the target. if it only means "squeeze the trigger" then everything is restricted in the above legalistic sense. Of course, in a broad sense, all guns in canada are prohibited, since its a crime to own one without the proper paperwork.
 
GrantR said:
Don't be too confident - what you say is arguably true, but ... this stock goes further, and alters a rifle configuration to a pistol grip without buttstock! (You'd be well advised to research some of the case law on this ... Perhaps I should mention that I am a lawyer.)


I am not a lawyer, but the ease of changing the bbl on a standard 10/22 makes it for a perfect candidate for a very difficult case.

I have a folding stock on mine, which puts us in the same overall length, but I can argue mine is not designed to be fired with a single hand. If I would have in my dwelling a shorter bbl (that would still be ok with a standard stock), or a light weight carbon bbl., one could assume that within minutes I can transform the firearm into a veritable handgun, very probable to be easy to aim and fire with one hand.

tricky thing you.ve got there. I'm sure that getting an Firearms officer to give you the ok on it would bring peace of mid.

the fact that rimfires 22s are subject to almost same regulations as the larger ceterfire calibres is an argument, but not if one is indicted....
 
GrantR said:
Perhaps I should mention that I am a lawyer.)
No ...you don't have to mention what your profession is.......unless you are specifically a firearms law expert, your opinion is worth no more than any one elses.

A non restricted rifle or shotgun does not change class due to the addition of a pistol grip.....it is still designed to be operated with 2 hands, just by sheer size and balance issues....any lawyer or welder would be able to argue that
 
coltfan said:
No ...you don't have to mention what your profession is.......unless you are specifically a firearms law expert, your opinion is worth no more than any one elses.
Okay ..... if you say so. :confused:


coltfan said:
A non restricted rifle or shotgun does not change class due to the addition of a pistol grip.....it is still designed to be operated with 2 hands, just by sheer size and balance issues....any lawyer or welder would be able to argue that
GOOD LUCK! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom