There is no "entry gun" you simply bought what you had cash for without exercising some discipline and saving more money for a better product. A limited budget is an issue, but as I posted if you can't afford a quality gun then you will struggle to afford to feed it or train with it. The gun is a fixed cost, the ammo and useage of it is not.
A gun costing thousands does not mean it is of quality make or manufacture, it means it cost several thousand. There are plenty of low quality guns and parts being sold at insanely high prices. Custom builds suffer from poor assembly issues as well. Comparing an expensive unknown quality rifle to a low cost low quality rifle is not a fair comparison and does not support your position.
So you admit the finish on the Norc is sh*t which means it is a low quality gun. Aside from the low cost and low quality of Norc firearms there is the other end of the spectrum of very high cost with little improvement firearms, like a Les Baer. A lot of money for a name but near zero improvement over a quality built 1911 like a Colt, Kimber, even a Springfield. I will digress in that I am not a 1911 fan, they're grossly outdated and inferior to all pistols except revolvers. You are correct, a $400 gun that works is better than any gun that does not or no gun at all. The problem is that Norc doesn't make a $400 gun that works..
Bob it's Rosetta Stone, not Resetta Stone.
Working min wage doesn't really save you anything as you're still poor.
How many rounds through your Norcs Bob? Have you ever taken a high round count class/course?
Glad to see there are some who get it. I bet you learned the hard way like most of us. Too bad more people won't listen to that hard earned wisdom..
This is an absolutely retarded comparison and weak attempt to validate your low dollar low quality gun. Let's ad some reality, I bet your T97 will blow up long before the Tavor does.
Do tell how many hundred rounds you've put through the rifle?