Norinco NP29 - the good the bad and the ugly...

Clobbersauras

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
96   0   0
Location
Waaay out west.
I wanted to see what all the fuss was about with the 1911. I've owned a few in the past, but I was more of a collector than shooter back then.

So as I do before starting most new things, I started researching 1911's. I came to a few conclusions:

1) I wanted one in 9mm. Because it's cool and all the big kids are running 9mm's 1911's.
2) I wanted a full size, just because I'm a big guy and If I'm going to shoot an all steel gun I might as well go full size.
3) If I wanted a reliable 9mm 1911 I was looking at spending at least $1200....at least. And that wouldn't give me super confidence that the pistol would work. If I wanted reliability I was looking at over $2k..

So faced with a $2K bill, I decided I would rather create some work for myself and go with the cheapest 9mm 1911 made. I've read some good things about the Norinco NP29, and of course everyone who owns them says they are 100% reliable. :rolleyes:

I found a gently used Norc NP29 on the EE that I picked up for $350 shipped with some new grips and a few mags. I knew going in that I would probably have to do some work on it, which didn't particularly scare me off because I'm a little bit of a Ninja with a Dremel tool and I can read so...;)

The Gun:

Well, you get what you pay for. It was actually nicely outfitted with all the go fast stuff, ambi safeties, beaver-tail grip safety, extended slide release,
obnoxiously large mag release and trigger with holes drilled in it (what ever that does). The sights weren't terrible, but the three dots had to go, so I whipped out the black Tremclad for the rear and bright orange engine paint for the front.

Much better.

The grips ware actually really nice. Color not withstanding, they are actually very grippy. I was curious about who manufactured them and discovered they are made by Ergo. I supplemented the lack of checkering with liberal use of skateboard tape (front strap, under trigger guard and along the left side of the frame) and called it a day.

Trigger actually wasn't too bad. Will need lots of dry fire with it. Safety activation was positive and it passed all the standard function/safety checks one does with a 1911. I didn't detail strip it, as I was curious how well it would shoot as is.

Finish was actually not bad for an inexpensive gun. Unfortunately there are sharp corners everywhere. I'll probably eventually take care of that, but it's good enough for now. I immediately cut down the extended slide release as I knew my freakishly long thumb would activate it under recoil. My trusty Dremel and some cold blue took care of it.

I checked the extractor tension per standard methods and it seemed fine. I held the case nice and tight and passed the standard "shake" tests, even though the actual extractor hook was horrid.

I also noticed a problem. Something wrong here (bonus points if you can spot it):

The Wilson mags didn't clear the ejector so I took care of that as well.

(like I said, Dremel Ninja)


Time for the range. I only had three mags; one Wilson ETM and two Norc factory. The factory mags were really rough, lots of issues loading them. I could work on them but I have some new Metalform mags coming so I'll probably just bin them instead of wasting my time. Interestingly, they worked fine once in the gun.

At the range, I put it through it's paces. It was acceptably accurate, recoil was negligible and I was getting used to the slim grips. It shot high and to the left for me. I'm confident enough in my shooting to know that it wasn't me, and it was confirmed by two other very competent shooters. I'll have to bench it on my next trip to baseline it and then drift the rear sight and perhaps file down the rear. Norc sights use non-standard dovetails, so unless I want to drop more coin on this pig, it's up to me to fix it.

So things went well for the first 100 rounds. The gun fed and fired everything reliably. I was starting to like the NP29. So I decided to put it through the 10-8/Hackathorn extractor test. Things went well for the first 6 rounds.

Then the wheels fell off.

Instead of ejecting between 2 and 5 o'clock, I had rounds hitting me in the head, dropping back down through the mag well and getting caught by the slide. Didn't matter if it was a two handed grip or SHO, It had unpredictable ejection. So I field stripped the extractor and did a little judicious bending. Popped it back in and tried again, no luck, same issues after about 5 rounds. (See above photos for the issue...)

I continued with my testing and the gun ran fairly well with the mags in it. I had two failures to fully eject at about the 250 round mark. Clearly the extractor has to be dealt with. I'm not interested in messing around with the factory one. It's garbage and I'm not confident enough in Norinco's ability to produce a quality small part as important as the extractor. I'll order an Aftec, and hopefully that will solve the problem.

Feeding seemed consistent, notice the skid marks on the frame and barrel.



The gun doesn't seem to be mag sensitive (hopefully) and I'm hopeful that this doesn't become a problem once a proper extractor is put in the gun.

I've also replaced the recoil spring with a Wilson Flat Wire spring. Again, I'm not confident in Norinco's ability to product quality small parts and the recoil spring is vitally important on a full size 9mm 1911. On advice of a Wilson Tech I clipped two coils.

I ground the flat for better contact on the guide rod face and will order a new plug to replace the factory FLG and FLG plug.


One more problem to report. The barrel link pin likes to walk out.

So I took care of that with some light staking.


Further testing: Once I'm confident that I have the extractor and recoil spring working properly I intend to put the Norc through a 2000 round challenge with no additional lube or cleaning to see how it performs with a few minor upgrades. I'll be running a variety of timed drills to see If I get any better performance with a 1911 than my Glock. More to come.
 
Last edited:
Great pics..

I like your approach no screaming or hollering at the gun just a methodical approach.. you'll have it working great in no time with any luck..congrats!!
 
Only things I find they need is tighter lockup. A properly fit bushing, and a link of correct length. Brownells has longer link pin kits and bushings. They shoot pretty well with just that...
 
Only things I find they need is tighter lockup. A properly fit bushing, and a link of correct length. Brownells has longer link pin kits and bushings. They shoot pretty well with just that...

Barrel-to-bushing fit seems fine, the-bushing-to slide fit leaves something to be desired.


I'm not really interested in replacing every part in the gun off the bat. Perhaps as I run through more ammo it will become necessary. We'll see.
 
I've actually found that it's always best to shoot the gun, and fix the issues, but we all want to do some customizing right off the bat.
Ivor
 
I got one of the older NP29's with the Commander style hammer and they seem to be better fitted.
BTW, It's a Norc and changing parts is fun. I've added a better trigger, Bomar rear and fiber optic sights on mine. My favourite centerfire semi.
 
Barrel-to-bushing fit seems fine, the-bushing-to slide fit leaves something to be desired.


I'm not really interested in replacing every part in the gun off the bat. Perhaps as I run through more ammo it will become necessary. We'll see.

Push down on the barrel hood and see if there is any play there....longer links are like $5, not a pricey fix there.
 
Very good write-up, and seems like your on the right track. looks like if anybody can get that gun running great...its you.
I have had 2 np29 norks. I encountered alot of the same issues. I find that the 45 seems to be better all around and more accurate. I feel the 9mm was kind of an after thought and did not recieve the same attention to detail that the 45 got.
 
Push down on the barrel hood and see if there is any play there....longer links are like $5, not a pricey fix there.

Thanks for the advice. I have a little play with the hood when it's in battery. I know this isn't ideal for accuracy, but I'm not really unhappy with it's accuracy now.

I'm not real comfortable playing with the length of the link. It's a black science and I don't want timing issues I don't have now. As it stands, I don't see any peening of the locking lugs on the barrel or lug recesses in the slide, so I think I'll leave it alone.
 
I found the 45's quite good out of the box (the new ones, not the old ones sold in the CANAMMo deal).

My 9mms did not shoot until i installed new barrels and set them up tight.

If you clip 2 coils off the hammer spring the trigger will be a pound or two lighter.

The rear sight is a standard Colt dovetail. I have installed the Colt LPA adjustable on some.
 
I found the 45's quite good out of the box (the new ones, not the old ones sold in the CANAMMo deal).

My 9mms did not shoot until i installed new barrels and set them up tight.

If you clip 2 coils off the hammer spring the trigger will be a pound or two lighter.

The rear sight is a standard Colt dovetail. I have installed the Colt LPA adjustable on some.

The absolute truth spoken right there . LOL.
 
I found the 45's quite good out of the box (the new ones, not the old ones sold in the CANAMMo deal).

My 9mms did not shoot until i installed new barrels and set them up tight.

If you clip 2 coils off the hammer spring the trigger will be a pound or two lighter.

The rear sight is a standard Colt dovetail. I have installed the Colt LPA adjustable on some.

Hey Ganderite.
I think your absolutely right about the dovetail as far as the older np29 governments go, but the New sports do not have the same dovetail. I just sent my slide off to Dlask to have them install their very nice combat adjustable sights. They have done the same to my 45, And they're very nice.
My extractor also needed adjustment, but the factory one was actually we'll machined, and upon bending, felt like good metal. I have retained the factory extractor for now.
Ivor
 
Decided to detail strip the NP29 today to see what I found.

Ambi safety was decent. Some sharp edges I may take care of later...

Mainspring housing is plastic. I don't really care as long as it works.


Grip safety was actually nicely done.

Hammer and strut. No MIM parts here. The strut was numbered to match the serial # on the frame. They half ass staked the pin. Seems solid enough but it's not pretty.

Lots of internal machine marks.

Sear and disconnector. These were a different colour than everything else, but they actually looked nicely done.


The mag release lock is garbage. It locked up tight then broke when I tried to remove it. The screw slot deformed all to hell , will have to order a new one. I've had this problem with two Norcs now.:mad:


Not real impressed with the trigger and bow. The bow was numbered to match the serial on the frame:

Nice and crooked.

Plunger spring assembly was ok, and the plunger tube was rock solid:

I lightly polished the feed ramp. Didn't care about getting a mirror finish, just wanted to remove any rough spots and machine marks. I was careful not the change the angle of anything as it feeds fine now.

I polished the trigger bow and the disconnector bow face as they were both pretty rough. Trigger is a tiny bit smoother now, but it wasn't that bad before.


That was it for today. I've been doing a ton of dry fire with this pistol and it points quite well. Mag changes are a little slower due to the small mag well opening. The 1911 trigger does not impress me as much as I thought it would. I actually think I prefer my Glock, which is odd. I'll explain more after I get another couple thousand trigger presses through it and can articulate what I'm experiencing.
 
Decided to detail strip the NP29 today to see what I found.

Ambi safety was decent. Some sharp edges I may take care of later...

Mainspring housing is plastic. I don't really care as long as it works.


Grip safety was actually nicely done.

Hammer and strut. No MIM parts here. The strut was numbered to match the serial # on the frame. They half ass staked the pin. Seems solid enough but it's not pretty.

Lots of internal machine marks.

Sear and disconnector. These were a different colour than everything else, but they actually looked nicely done.


The mag release lock is garbage. It locked up tight then broke when I tried to remove it. The screw slot deformed all to hell , will have to order a new one. I've had this problem with two Norcs now.:mad:


Not real impressed with the trigger and bow. The bow was numbered to match the serial on the frame:

Nice and crooked.

Plunger spring assembly was ok, and the plunger tube was rock solid:

I lightly polished the feed ramp. Didn't care about getting a mirror finish, just wanted to remove any rough spots and machine marks. I was careful not the change the angle of anything as it feeds fine now.

I polished the trigger bow and the disconnector bow face as they were both pretty rough. Trigger is a tiny bit smoother now, but it wasn't that bad before.


That was it for today. I've been doing a ton of dry fire with this pistol and it points quite well. Mag changes are a little slower due to the small mag well opening. The 1911 trigger does not impress me as much as I thought it would. I actually think I prefer my Glock, which is odd. I'll explain more after I get another couple thousand trigger presses through it and can articulate what I'm experiencing.
Are you trying to overturn your mag release screws?
Ivor
 
No, I know how to do it. It wouldn't release when I turned it. And then wouldn't engage when I tried to turn clockwise again.

I think it had a major burr on it or it was out of spec. Or both. The screw was soft.

That sucks, give Dlask a call, and they should be able to help with new parts. I find the springs in Norincos just good enough to break in the gun before they need new ones. I order from Dlask when I get a large enough need order.
Ivor
 
Back
Top Bottom