Mystic Precision
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Summerland, BC
My rifles currently have Sightron SIII 10-50, SV 10-50 and STAC 3-16. I use the high mag scopes as often as possible for load development.
Jerry
Jerry
In this case I am running a 5.5-22 x 56mm Nightforce with NPR1 reticle. You can see most holes at that range with this scope but those few that you cannot you just drive up to the target etc.
So I finally got stage one of load testing done this past weekend:Temp was 14C and test range was 215m with light but steady winds. Both loads measure 3.728 COAL
Load 1: 285gr Hornady Match BTHP: Best group node was produced with 85.5, 86 and 86.5grains H1000 measured 0.619" at 215M (this was the higher velocity node) with no signs of pressure even at max published load
Load 2 : 300gr Sierra SMK: Best group was 0.705 at 76, 76.5 7 77gr of H4831SC. Again no pressure signs even at max loads
With regards to the 285's I will run batches of five at each mentioned weight and measure those groups and go from there but will not chase it down too much further: as Litz implies says: you'd be better served practicing with your known decent load than forever striving to reduce your current MOA load if it is already accurate (below 1 moa). I am confident however that I can tweak the 300gr load further.
I am very please at how my rifle shoots the 285's and to be honest a little disappointed at the 300gr. I went into it thinking the 300SMK would outshoot the Hornady Match 285's: that being said I may even run a ladder test with 300SMK pushed by H1000 to further level the playing field with regards to the load development. The reason I did not do it this time is because I have only 4lbs of H1000 but a good supply of H4831SC.
Both current loads are still very promising though producing ~1/3 moa accuracy.
Thoughts?