Any COC seems to have a way smoother action IMO.
It's the one finger bolt lift that makes it seem like butter.
Thanks to all for their insight and comments.
Mark
Any COC seems to have a way smoother action IMO.
What hasn't been said yet, is that military rifles were made coc in order to have no extra pressure on opening the bolt. Thus, if the case was sticking they had full power on the bolt handle to cam it loose.
After WW1 Remington made a lot of their left over Pattern of 1917 rifles into sporters, calling them the Remington 30 Express. The first thing they did was change the bolt over to coo.
If there is a civilian bolt action rifle that cocks on closing, I am not aware of it. The rifle manufacturers should know what shooters want.
What hasn't been said yet, is that military rifles were made coc in order to have no extra pressure on opening the bolt. Thus, if the case was sticking they had full power on the bolt handle to cam it loose.
, that's the first thing of which I think....
In the magazine articles, those first million rifles were mentioned as seldom as possible. Instead, the Lee-Enfield was dumped on for its 'weak' action and the rear-mounted locking lugs which made accuracy impossible. It made an entire generation of Canadians grow up despising the rifles which their own fathers and grandfathers had fought with. This attitude survives today: just listen to how people STILL denigrate the 'lousy old .303'.




























