Too bad that you make a generalized statement like you did without any facts. Yes many groups had put in sons, daughters, wives etc, but if one of them drew the tag, the only transfer was the one the computer generated, no other. Don't forget the sons, daughters, wives etc all took the Hunter safety course and applied the first year as a Pool 2 applicant, then again the next year as a Pool 1 and if they eventually drew a tag, reverted back to a Pool 2. We couldn't put a bunch of non hunters in out group draw request because if one of them drew the tag, the computer could have made a transfer available to another one of the non goers and then non of us goes hunting.
We did put in a few non goers but made sure that they were relatively newer Pool 1 people so they wouldn't be drawing a tag, only using them as numbers to increase our group size. They bought the licence to enter the draw just like anyone else. A majority of groups used this type of system because it helped us get a tag but it also required us to change WMU's quite often over the years when the required group size increased.
You call it abuse of the system but your wrong. The MNR set up the system and we just looked at it and said, how can we use the system to our best advantage, that's all.
The last paragraph in your post was absolute BS.