I had the .300 win mag version of the 116fcss, and I was shooting .87 inch 3 shot groups with reloads. (200 gr accubonds over 70.5 gr of reloader 19) I love the accuracy of the gun, but the only gripe I had was the distance between the scope bases (its really far apart). I mounted a 3200 Bushnell Elite 3-9x40 and I had NO eye relief (even with 1 extension ring) And I had to grind out a v-shaped portion on that extension ring so the bell housing could get clearance. It was a nightmare. I tried to switch scopes to the Burris fullfield II 3-9x but it was the same,
So what I am saying is that you should REALLY MAKE SURE THE SCOPE YOU ARE PLANNING TO MOUNT ON A LONG ACTION 116 has enough scope tube to give you a bit of choice in how much eye relief you have. When I mounted the 3200, I touched my eyebrow several times with the scope, Even the guys at the gunstore I bought it at had a hard time finding rings and bases that would accomodate a normal sized scope.
Other than that , it shot like a house on fire. All my friends gave up trying to beat me at 100 yards.
Wow, sgt.rock, that's the kind of thing I've been wondering about. I'm wanting a 30-06 for the versatility, but the long action has me concerned. A 308 will do all that a 30-06 will, but I like the idea of that little bit extra, plus I like the history of the cartridge (I know, I'm weird that way).
I'll chek out what I can on the website on the american classic, hopefully the spacing on the bases is less (highly doubt it). I've been back and forth 30-06 and 308, this might be the point that settles it. But I so like the idea of carrying a 30-06...



















































