I was recently told by a gunsmith / gun builder that the P14 and 17, '03 Springfield, and Lee Enfields should be relegated to wall-hangers as the metal in their respective actions deteriorates or weakens over time and could quite literally blow up.
Many years ago I recall hearing stories of certain Springfields being iffey to use, but never the P14/17 and having seen and used several aside from my 404, I find this hard to swallow.
My brother who unfortunately doesn't own a computer and can't speak up here has several, among them a 505 Gibbs, a 510 Wells, a 416 Rigby,a 264 Mag, and a few others. He likes working with them not only for their size but especially their strength factor, so is this open to debate ?
Maybe I can keep this thread going for another post or two if I put up a pic of my old reliable Rem 30 (Enfield) in 35 Whelen.....failing that maybe Kell can work his magic again ??
Many years ago I recall hearing stories of certain Springfields being iffey to use, but never the P14/17 and having seen and used several aside from my 404, I find this hard to swallow.
My brother who unfortunately doesn't own a computer and can't speak up here has several, among them a 505 Gibbs, a 510 Wells, a 416 Rigby,a 264 Mag, and a few others. He likes working with them not only for their size but especially their strength factor, so is this open to debate ?
Maybe I can keep this thread going for another post or two if I put up a pic of my old reliable Rem 30 (Enfield) in 35 Whelen.....failing that maybe Kell can work his magic again ??


















































