Picture of the day

Yeah, or the Blackburn Firebrand. It started off looking not too hideous, which is something of a miracle for a Blackburn product...

1434615081409.jpg


royal-navy-blackburn-firebrand-dd815-air-to-air-the-aviation-photo-company.jpg


...but by the time it got to the Navy, it had a "Hugh Jass" on it.

b86b55fe74d78bbae60b9ca581ed1d77.jpg


blackburn-firebrand-tf5-ek777-9893415.jpg.webp


Doubtless due to the change to a bigger engine with a lot more torque and the need to manage it, but jeez, that's an ungainly solution.
 
Blackburn seldom produced an airplane that wasn't in some horrible way disfigured. It's like they let Supermarine make beautiful things, and instead found a niche building homely flying objects.

++++++++++++++++++++++

Bristol produced the Blenheim and Bolingbroke in numbers, but until this morning I had no idea they'd made a ground attack variant - the Bisley (an apt name for a British thing with plenty of guns):

1434592299266.jpg


bisley-9.jpg


A four-gun nose and an improved turret. A nice light snack for German fighters, but effective when paired with fighter escort.
 
Point taken, and fair enough. However, Blackburn seems to have elected to offer the Air Ministry the unhappiest-looking designs they could muster. It's like they mistook creases in the blueprints for structural members.

Air Ministry Specification F.7/30 called for a fighter "capable of at least 250 mph and armed with four machine guns".

Gloster offered them the Gladiator:

1434604360900.jpg


Bristol threw the 123 in the ring:

1434623771266.jpg


...and the innovative 133:

1434623154639.jpg


Hawker sent the P.V.3:

1434614563201.jpg


Somone at Westland fell asleep in the wind tunnel and had a fevered dream that gave the world the F.7/30:

Westland_fighter%2C_1934_%28Our_Generation%2C_1938%29.jpg


Over at Supermarine, R.J. Mitchell was getting closer to the Spitfire with the stuka-esque 224:

DWXBQzqW4AAscFr.jpg


And what did the practiced aesthetes over at Blackburn deliver into the world, plucked screaming from the womb?

attachment.php


This sad little mutant was the Blackburn F.3.

7f90223651b52d3f2dcd5670bd2ae219.jpg


It might be overstating it, and perhaps cruelly, to say Blackburn never made an airplane that wasn't in some way a nasty-to-behold-misshapen-potato object, but I think I can say they were pretty consistently unpleasant looking things. They sold, the RAF and RN bought plenty, so they must have worked reasonably well or been somehow better than the competition, but they weren't pretty.

Palate cleanser: One Spitfire in the world operates in a polished metal finish. This is it.

AGO_Arrows_2019_silver_spitfire_dibbs_1.jpg


She is currently on a round-the-world tour, quite the accomplishment for a lady designed as short range interceptor. As I type this, FlightTracker says G-IRTY is in Bangkok. Details here: https://www.silverspitfire.com/

This is one of humanity's most beautiful things, and shining her up really brings that out.
 
Yeah, I can see that. Kinda "Italianate" lines, like an early Macchi product. Not bad considering the competition, huh?

bristol-type-133-r-10-10633450.jpg.webp


Retractable gear, stressed skin wings, an enclosed cockpit. Tubby, like a lot of girls from her era, but you can see the engineers coming to some conclusions about what was coming...

1434623154906.jpg


Lost in a non-fatal accident and scrapped. Shame, that. I find her charming.

1434623154380.jpg
 
Something I found out just yesterday.

First allied bomber to drop bombs on Berlin was Farman 223 "Jules Verne" on the night of 7 June 1940.

qePTOQa.jpg


Not very successful bomber so it served in transport role for both Free French and Vichy forces.

I honestly thought AW Whitley bombers were the first there.

BEp083F.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yeah, or the Blackburn Firebrand. It started off looking not too hideous, which is something of a miracle for a Blackburn product...

1434615081409.jpg


royal-navy-blackburn-firebrand-dd815-air-to-air-the-aviation-photo-company.jpg


...but by the time it got to the Navy, it had a "Hugh Jass" on it.

b86b55fe74d78bbae60b9ca581ed1d77.jpg


blackburn-firebrand-tf5-ek777-9893415.jpg.webp


Doubtless due to the change to a bigger engine with a lot more torque and the need to manage it, but jeez, that's an ungainly solution.

The brits had to tell their Seafire pilots to kick back and relax on the raids on Balikpapan because they were too delicate for the rough sea state carrier operations. I guess the Admiralty was having none of that resulting in the Sea Fury and Firebrand. As you said the engine generated so much torque it needed a big tail to deal with it. It is carrying that torpedo like it was a toothpick - a beast!
 
Seafires were kinda like supermodels - beautiful, great at what they do, but high maintenance and a little fragile for the kind of stresses they operate under.

supermarine-seafire-f46-la541-9886875.jpg.webp


A later Griffon-powered Seafire. Pretty bird.
 
Back
Top Bottom