Picture of the day

Please inform me as to what aspect of your person have I insulted. Doubt you're the guy in the picture, we havn't had dispatch riders for many a years and I would be amusingly troubled that you identify to the name of Vivianne :)

So if I'm betting with the guy in the picture you're 90ish or more and as such I'll take the bet ( Jerry, however, will be pissed; he had a busy weekend coming up)
Cheers mate
No problem, just a little joke and I won't be 90ish for a few years yet. Cheers!
 
Meanwhile, 700 yards away...

Hx9fOmJ.jpg


"Klaus vas saying he likes puzzi. He vasn't schpezifik, und zo ve tried to cover all der bazes..."
 
The Reising was the American Sten - a stop gap measure, cheaper and easier to produce than the Thompson.

I had a chance to buy one and get 'grandfathered'. Handling it changed my mind. Wish I had done otherwise now .... :>(
 
I read the USMC hated the Reising SMG because of reliability issues in the Pacific jungles. I'm surprised the Soviets used any.

The issues with Reising reliability had to do with how they were used and maintained by the Corps. Reising's were hand fit guns - barrel individually fit to receiver, individually fit to bolt, etc. And all matching Reising is pretty reliable, by all accounts.

The problem stems from how they were maintained by the Corps. The regimental armorers would strip them down to components for cleaning and maintenance (which happened fairly often, given the mud, rain, sand, volcanic grit, etc. of the campaign environment), and clean them in batches... Barrels and bolts would get mix-mastered, and, well... problems.

It wasn't really a bad design, and individual soldiers who had "good 'uns" would swear by them (lighter than the Thompson by a fair margin, and more compact with that collapsible stock). Just the manufacturing never got fully sorted out for mass production - too much hand fitting. In an institutional environment, that's the death knell of reliability. Especially in wartime conditions.
 
Back
Top Bottom