Scenes like those & the history behind the Holocaust must never be forgotten.![]()
I would argue that in any counter insurgency operation in today's world that the likely availability of MANPADS would necessitate some means of self-defence/Chaff/IR Flare/Distraction system.
The payload of the AT802 is insane. IMHO that's what "we" need to support the missions the military get sent on these days.
I agree but I am afraid it already has been .as people seem to forget the process that people ended up in those camps it was incremental , not overnight.
I would argue that in any counter insurgency operation in today's world that the likely availability of MANPADS would necessitate some means of self-defence/Chaff/IR Flare/Distraction system.
The payload of the AT802 is insane. IMHO that's what "we" need to support the missions the military get sent on these days.
If you're going to be flying into the envelope of MANPADS, as the AT-802 and variants certainly would, then yes, virtually a necessity. That said, the AT-802 does not typically carry them.
About 75% of its empty weight, typically a pair of 500 lb bombs, a handful of rockets, and the 0.50 cal MG. Looks more impressive than it really is.
The 802 can be fitted with countermeasures, and some variants are.
As for payload... Well, it can be fitted with a larger payload than the Tucano, and for COIN, you're not going up against regiments, just small groups dug in. A couple of 500 pounders, some small rockets, and a strafing run with the 50's would go a long way to curbing the enthusiasm of a couple of farmers who got their dander up. And that loiter time... There's a lot to be said for an aircraft just "being there" as top cover. So long as they can hear that engine buzzing around overhead, the average insurgent is much less likely to even engage a patrol to start with. I'm just thinking out loud, not even remotely an expert on the subject.
CWHM
![]()
Never said it couldn't. It just typically isn't. First line operators UAE and Jordan, for example, do not usually put any kind of countermeasures on their AT-802s.
Heavier potential payload than Tucano, yes. But the AT-802 sacrifices some performance to achieve it. It is slower, less maneuverable and has a much lower ceiling. Doesn't matter much when you're dropping dumb bombs or rockets or MG fire on poorly armed farmers, smugglers or criminals, but if you cannot get out of the envelope of potential MANPADS in a higher risk environment, it means a great deal. Tucano can stay out of that envelope and still be combat effective.
Currently a Pilot instructor at Whiteman Air Force Base. In mid November, he crossed over the 6000 hour mark in the A-10, including 950 Combat Hours. So far. ... And with a bit of creative Google-Foo, lots more about this guy. Possibly the single most experienced combat pilot currently serving the in USAF.
There is a B-52 pilot who achieved 9,000 hours a couple of years back.