Picture of the day

I was born in Germany and went back once, very difficult to find any sign of the war's devastation, you have to look for it, the rebuilding has been amazing. Time will tell if the same applies for the Ukraine, given the pounding the Russians are giving it.:mad:
Grizz

For sure. I moved to Germany in 69 which was only 24 years after the war and was quite surprised at the amount of war damage that was restored. There were quite a few concrete pill boxes not far from the Rhine River but they were all blown up and fenced off. The restoration work in that period of time was quite remarkable.
 
The Northrop X-4 Bantam.

14b_am14_northrop_x-4_live.jpg


Northrop-X4-Bantam.jpg


0000022444.jpg


0000120525.jpg


Brilliant looking wee thing. Despite being minute, it was twin-engined.

Now hanging from the ceiling at the USAF Museum in Dayton, OH.

151124-F-IO108-005.JPG


Not a success, but did provide data on tailless design behaviour near mach. This from Wikiperdia:

The first X-4 (serial number 46-676) was delivered to Muroc Air Force Base, California, in November 1948. It underwent taxi tests and made its first flight on December 15, 1948, with Northrop test pilot Charles Tucker at the controls. Winter rains flooded Rogers Dry Lake soon after, preventing additional X-4 flights until April 1949. The first X-4 proved mechanically unreliable, and made only ten flights. Walter C. Williams, the head of the NACA Muroc Flight Test Unit (now Dryden Flight Research Center) called the aircraft a "lemon".[1] The second X-4 (serial number 46-677) was delivered during the halt of flights, and soon proved far more reliable. It made a total of 20 contractor flights. Despite this, the contractor flight program dragged on until February 1950, before both aircraft were turned over to the Air Force and the NACA. The first X-4 never flew again, used as spare parts for the second aircraft.

The NACA instrumented the second X-4 to conduct a short series of flights with Air Force pilots. These included Chuck Yeager, Frank Kendall Everest, Jr., Al Boyd, Richard Johnson, Fred Ascani, Arthur Murray and Jack Ridley. The flights were made in August and September 1950. The first flight by an NACA pilot was made by John H. Griffith on September 28, 1950.

The initial NACA X-4 flights, which continued from late 1950 through May of 1951, focused on the aircraft's sensitivity to pitch. NACA pilots Griffith and Scott Crossfield noted that as the X-4's speed approached Mach 0.88, it began a pitch oscillation of increasing severity, which was likened to driving on a washboard road. Increasing speeds also caused a tucking phenomenon, in which the nose pitched down, a phenomenon also experienced by the Me 163A Anton prototypes in 1941. More seriously, the aircraft also showed a tendency to "hunt" about all three axes. This combined yaw, pitch and roll, which grew more severe as the speed increased, was a precursor to the inertial coupling which would become a major challenge in the years to come.

To correct the poor stability, project engineers decided to increase the flap/speed brake trailing edge thickness. Balsa wood strips were added between the upper and lower hinged "clamshell"-style flap/speed brake halves, causing them to remain open at a 5° angle. The first test of the blunt trailing edge was flown on 20 August 1951 by NACA pilot Walter Jones. A second test was made by Crossfield in October. The results were positive, with Jones commenting that the X-4's flight qualities had been greatly improved, and the aircraft did not have pitch control problems up to a speed of Mach 0.92.

The balsa strips were removed, and the X-4 then undertook a long series of flights to test landing characteristics. By opening the speed brakes, the lift-to-drag ratio of the aircraft could be reduced to less than 3:1. This was for data on future rocket-powered aircraft. The tests continued through October 1951, until wing tank fuel leaks forced the aircraft to be grounded until March 1952, when the landing tests resumed. NACA pilots Joe Walker, Stanley Butchard, and George Cooper were also checked out in the aircraft.

The thickened flap/speed brake tests had been encouraging, so balsa wood strips were reinstalled on both the flap/speed brake and the elevons. The first flight was made by Jones on 19 May 1952, but one of the engines was damaged during the flight, and it was August before a replacement J30 could be found. When the flights resumed, they showed that the modifications had improved stability in both pitch and yaw, and delayed the nosedown trim changes from Mach 0.74 to Mach 0.91. Above Mach 0.91, however, the X-4 still oscillated.

In May 1953, the balsa wood strips were again removed, and the X-4's dynamic stability was studied in the original flap/speed brake and elevon configuration. These flights were made by Crossfield and John B. McKay. This was the final project for the X-4, which made its 81st and final NACA flight on September 29, 1953. Both aircraft survived the test program. The first X-4, AF serial number 46-676, was transferred to the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado, before being returned to Edwards Air Force Base.[1] 46-676 has been restored as of August 2012, and is currently being held in storage pending placement in the Edwards Museum. The second X-4 went to the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, where it remains on display.

The X-4's primary importance involved proving a negative, in that a swept-wing semi-tailless design was not suitable for speeds near Mach 1, although Vought's F7U Cutlass proved to be something of a counterexample—the developed version was the first aircraft to demonstrate stores separation above Mach 1. Aircraft designers were thus able to avoid this dead end. It was not until the development of computer fly-by-wire systems that such designs could be practical. Semi-tailless designs appeared on the X-36, Have Blue, F-117, and Bird of Prey, although these aircraft all differed significantly in shape from the X-4. The trend during its test program was already towards delta and modified delta aircraft such as the Douglas F4D, the Convair F-102A derived from the XF-92A, and the Avro Vulcan.
 

Attachments

  • 0000022444.jpg
    0000022444.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 604
SR-71-Go-Around.jpg

SR-71-one-engine-Full-AB.jpg


Blackbird pilots explain why flying the SR-71 with just one engine in full afterburner was Blackbird aircrews’ most dangerous operation

By Linda Sheffield Miller
Dec 18 2022

Taken on Nov. 1, 1981 by US Air Force (USAF) Scene Camera Operator Ken Hackman, the interesting photos in this post feature an SR-71 Blackbird flying with just one engine in full afterburner, using just one rudder.
The SR-71 spy plane was the world’s fastest jet-propelled aircraft and the most advanced member of the Blackbird family developed by Lockheed Aircraft Corporation’s clandestine “Skunk Works” division. The SR-71 was designed to fly deep into hostile territory, avoiding interception with its tremendous speed and high altitude. It could operate safely at a maximum speed of Mach 3+ at an altitude more than sixteen miles above the earth.

Why is that?

‘That is what we called a “single-engine go around,”’ says Stormy Boudreaux, SR-71 Blackbird pilot. ‘It was a practiced emergency procedure. It simulated what you had to do if you were making a single engine approach to land and for a variety of reasons something made the runway or the landing impossible so you “went around” on only one engine. The tremendous thrust with one engine in full afterburner and the other in idle was eye-opening! To counter the yaw from that engine required full rudder as well as banking the aircraft into the good engine in order to maintain your flight direction down the runway.
‘Most twin engine aircraft have to do something similar but it’s darn right frightening the first time you try it in the SR-71. That one engine in AB is really pushing the nose around trying to turn the jet away from that engine and the amount of bank angle when at low speed makes you glad you are strapped tightly in the seat. It’s almost a knife edge pass!’

Boudreaux is echoed by David Peters, another SR-71 pilot.

‘As Stormy said the picture indicate a single engine go around. Thrust was never an issue. What became imperative was the ability to point the airplane. Under most conditions full opposite rudder and a slight bank into the operating engine was enough. By under certain conditions other factors came into play. Minimum control speed being most important.

‘We had a couple of missions out of Mildenhall that went hot to the tankers. That required a heavy takeoff using a 65,000-pound yo-yo fuel load. In the winter time with freezing temperatures in England min control speed was a huge factor. Once the burners lit if you lost an engine on takeoff once the burners were lit your only option was to eject. Why you ask.

‘Well the runway there is only 8,000 feet. There was so much thrust developed in the cold, heavy air climate that your speed combined with gross weight would not allow you to abort since you couldn’t stop the airplane. There was plenty of thrust available to fly on one engine but there was so much thrust you could not control it below min control speed which in those cases was generally around 260 knots. So, the only thing you could do was pull both engines to idle pop the chute and eject.

‘I always felt that was perhaps our most dangerous operation.’

Be sure to check out Linda Sheffield Miller (Col Richard (Butch) Sheffield’s daughter, Col. Sheffield was an SR-71 Reconnaissance Systems Officer) Facebook Pages Habubrats and Born into the Wilde Blue Yonder for awesome Blackbird’s photos and stories.

Photo credit: Scene Camera Operator Ken Hackman / U.S. Air Force
 
Last edited:
For sure. I moved to Germany in 69 which was only 24 years after the war and was quite surprised at the amount of war damage that was restored. There were quite a few concrete pill boxes not far from the Rhine River but they were all blown up and fenced off. The restoration work in that period of time was quite remarkable.

Lots of war damage evidence still visible in Athens, of course all the rubble has been cleaned up but lots of buildings with shell pocks and also lts of buildings still sit with half gone structures on on side or the other, you see lots of outside walls on buildings that have doorways that used to enter another room but now the room is gone & the door goes to nowhere. My FIL claimed "repair is not allowed, we want the reminders of Nazi occupation to be there for younger generations to guard against it ever happening again".
 
Lots of war damage evidence still visible in Athens, of course all the rubble has been cleaned up but lots of buildings with shell pocks and also lts of buildings still sit with half gone structures on on side or the other, you see lots of outside walls on buildings that have doorways that used to enter another room but now the room is gone & the door goes to nowhere. My FIL claimed "repair is not allowed, we want the reminders of Nazi occupation to be there for younger generations to guard against it ever happening again".

When we were visiting Arnhem a few years ago to touch base with my wife's family, I noticed a pattern with a lot of the historical buildings. There would be a large plaque detailing when the building was made, by whom, and for what purpose, usually dating to around the height of the VOC's wealth and power. Below the large plaque would be a much smaller, blink and you miss it, plaque with a "Rebuilt and restored in 194x" "195x". Beautiful town, that had a mostly unremarkable war, until Monty got cocky. Market Garden was a disaster for many Dutch towns. The people came out in force to wave flags and cheer on the liberating Allies, and when they got beaten back, the Germans took revenge on the towns by levelling them.

Many of the historical buildings in these towns had to be rebuilt brick by brick. It took well over a decade to accomplish.
 
319563034-5725073690934170-4334990469649041171-n.jpg


Curious picture
In today's times that no one passes without a "selfie", since the Pcabo paratrooper Jose Rebelo, was way ahead...
He took his "selfie" in the middle of Angolan forest, at the service of 2. the Skydiver Company in 1970
Photo by Jose Rebelo
Peter Chestnut

it's an Algerian knife, captured trophy from the guerrillas. It's a copy of the German Hitler youth knife, but the diamond contains "ALN" instead of the swastika. In the 1960s both MPLA and FNLA guerrillas received training and support from Algeria and these knives were present in Angola.
 
Last edited:
Gotta hand it to the French. They're not afraid to innovate when it comes to military kit. Between the wars, they got downright nuts. Here's the FCM Char 2c, an armoured condominum with a pool table, hot tub, and full commercial kitchen:

20152310174816.jpg


"Yep, interwar tank" you say. Here are some crewmembers for scale:

20152310154318.jpg


Here's one kitted out with pennants, probably for a sailing regatta or something:

20152310162936.jpg


And here's Ol' 91, on her way to a new home in the "Reichsmuseum fur Vad-ze-fak-iz-dis":

train-fcm-2c-tank-1.jpg


The French Air Force had planes that ran the gamut from "barn with wings"...


farman-f220-3b3f78c8-3170-4c6f-b044-5ed40d8e793-resize-750.jpeg


...to objects of rather sublime beauty:

11080L.jpg


Dewoitine_D.342_Air_France_de_Gaston_Chenu.jpg


Lior%C3%A9_et_Olivier%2C_LeO_451.jpg


Neat stuff.
 

Attachments

  • train-fcm-2c-tank-1.jpg
    train-fcm-2c-tank-1.jpg
    67.3 KB · Views: 727
Last edited:
414874-278345265546818-196934851-o.jpg



CHRISTMAS A LONG PARTY
By José Talhadas.
...When I think of my experience in the former colonies, I always remember Christmas. More than lamenting the absence of the family at that time, this date has its rewarding aspect as it revives the camaraderie, the simple memory of those who were by my side, in good times and bad, throughout an important phase - perhaps definitive - of my human formation...
...In 1968, for the 3rd consecutive year, I spent the Christmas season in the woods. And I make this observation because in the letters I sent to my girlfriend at that time I mentioned it with a certain melancholy:«« I have been spending Christmas overseas for three years. In those years I never spent it in the city. In Angola in the bush. Here in Guinea, I also spent the first one in the bush protecting a boat that was sunk by the IN.(Enemy). if in our lines. Fortunately, during these three days of patrols, nothing happened, but I was able to spend Christmas away from civilization again»....
Excerpts from the book: MEMORIES OF A COLONIAL WARRIOR...
In the image (taken from the book). José Talhadas on the Cacheu River, protecting the boat that was sunk by the IN.(Enemy) Seeing the NRP SAGITÁRIO (P1131) anchored in protection for the rescue action.
 
Seems to me they're a little late to protect that particular boat... As our Newfoundlander cousins would say, "De arse is out of 'er..."

Christmas, Ortona, 1943.

2018-12-25T22-37-26.306Z--123.482_848x480_1408422979920.jpg


I hope your Christmas brings you the relief they had, and I pray the days that come after are nowhere near as rough as what they saw. Merry Christmas, folks.
 
Back
Top Bottom