No need for optics on that gun. I really don’t like the marlin rifles looks and feel don’t work for me. Never played with a Henry.My Henry Big Boy in 44 Magnum with Colour case hardened receiver and heavy 16.5" octagon barrel put 10 rounds in one hole, at 50 yards, last time I went to the range.
The Henrys like the Marlins are easy to install optics on, compared to the Winchesters.
...The "thin rims" of the .45 Colt are exactly the same thickness as .44 magnum!!And pick the 44 over the 45. The thin rims on the 45 colt are a pain in the a$$.
Lots of bullet options for the 44 too. I had a .45 Colt in a Marlin 1894 and am happy I switched to the 44 in a Win/Miroku 1892. The 1892 feeds much better and is way smoother. I had a "WWG Happy Trigger" on the 1894 and it was really nice, but even so I'm happier with the 1892 in 44 mag.
I’m a hand loader and know that 45lc can surpass 44mag when hand loaded...The "thin rims" of the .45 Colt are exactly the same thickness as .44 magnum!!
Perhaps you are looking at brass made before 1900??
If the OP is not a handloader, then .44 magnum has a better selection of factory high velocity loads - .45 Colt is probably limited to handloads and Biffalo Bore...
Yes, that's what he asked.its down to why choose one action over the other, 92 vs 94 ?
Likewise fer me. Many folks could use a proper read on the 45 Colt.I’m a hand loader and know that 45lc can surpass 44mag when hand loaded
It wasn't mentioned... but a Marlin 1894 in 45 Colt checks all the boxes. And with the above post, a lot of versatility.If one would buy a 44mg or 45lc is he better with a current production miroku Winchester model 92 or a model 94?
Thanks



























