Hi mark44 ...more stuff regarding your pistol.
These photos are from Jan Still's book Axis Pistols.
Posted on Jan Still’s Forum on 09/01/2003 and later on 01/13/2004 by a knowledgeable collector.
4 Characteristics of an Original KM Radom.
“Due to the recent traffic in the discussion of what constitutes the real features of a KM Radom , I am reposting these 4 characteristics which are found on ALL original Kreigsmarine Radom's , whether they have fleet numbers or not. They must have all 4 of these features and if not, drop, turn, and run to the nearest exit. Most, if not all the fakes will have one or more of these features missing. Serial numbers will run up to not more than A5600's.
-KM proof will be in near vertical alignment with the take down lever slot of the slide.
-The front grip strap will always have a letter N pantographed whether it has fleet markings or not.
-The once installed original lanyard ring will be removed and show evidence of such.
-The barrel will always be blued as view through the ejection port.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another comment from a Forum member recently. (He thinks your gun is 'right as rain'.)
He is a serious Radom guy….but he has never seen one like yours.
“Polish Eagle KM marked is in 10 000 block and there are a few Polish Eagles Nazi over stamped in that block. The Germans had to come across some Polish legend slides and used them in their production. Truly it is not a Polish Eagle, it has a Polish slide.
There are at least four examples of Polish eagle Nazi over stamped (Berger’s book as well as Jan C. Still’s book) they are not navy marked.”
-------------------------------------------------------------
mark44 what is the serial number on your pistol?
When you have a rare pistol you have to expect this as none have been seen with KM markings on a 1939 with the Polish eagle legend.
Most collectors recognize the type of KM markings shown below without the Polish eagle legend.
That is the mystery with your pistol....no one has seen one.
That does not mean that it is incorrect....just different.
David