View attachment 9049View attachment 9047
Archerynut, I agree with you. I like the look of the original gun without the compensator best, but to each their own. One of my 1928's had a somewhat wobbly compensator so I replaced it with an after market front sight which gives it that nice 1921 look.
Myenfield, the British ordered 1928's had the British broad arrow and inspector proof marks on the receivers. I believe, the first Thompson guns that came to Canada where simply picked from this batch. I have never seen these with any "Canadian" markings but that doesn't mean there were none. I have seen pictures of a M1 butt stock with a Canadian C broad arrow stamped in the wood. I don't know if the C broad arrow was ever stamped on the receivers.
Thompsons look much nicer and less clumsy without the Cutts compensator on the end.
Archerynut, I agree with you. I like the look of the original gun without the compensator best, but to each their own. One of my 1928's had a somewhat wobbly compensator so I replaced it with an after market front sight which gives it that nice 1921 look.
Myenfield, the British ordered 1928's had the British broad arrow and inspector proof marks on the receivers. I believe, the first Thompson guns that came to Canada where simply picked from this batch. I have never seen these with any "Canadian" markings but that doesn't mean there were none. I have seen pictures of a M1 butt stock with a Canadian C broad arrow stamped in the wood. I don't know if the C broad arrow was ever stamped on the receivers.