You have a rifle to hunt with.
Your gun has no collector value.
I'd guess it is worth $325
I think that estimate is too high.
You have a rifle to hunt with.
Your gun has no collector value.
I'd guess it is worth $325
I think that estimate is too high.
I didn't want to kick the guy in the balls..
I need to retrack my barrel swap comment. I read somewhere in this land of FRED (frick'in rediculous electronic devices) that
if the top rear barrel and the adjoinning receiver area were stamped (WP), then the barrel was replaced by Winchester.
I as of now don't have much belief in this statement unless proven wrong. I have a couple here and am quite sure the barrels
are original and they too have the (WP) stamped on the same location. It was just posted not that long ago this is the stamp that Winchester does after test firing the firearm. That makes more sense to me. Anyone wish to clarify on this? Muchly appreciated.
Merry Christmas.
According to Madis in the model 94 the WP proof mark is seldom found before serial no. 350,000, after this no.it will be found on bolth barrel and receiver of the majority of arms. For the 94 this translates to about 1906

So if the five didgit serial number 94's go back prior to this, would that indicate
the rifle was sent back to Winchester for a barrel replacement?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Or someone screwed a newer barrel onto it.
Hell no.
It's a good Short Wood beater.
Personally I wouldn't pay $250 because there's lots around much nicer for only slightly more.



























